this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
446 points (98.1% liked)

Progressive Politics

3244 readers
1345 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

No, it doesn't. Countries have no legal obligation to stop something happening outside their borders.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Imagine being so confident, yet incorrect.

You could have taken 2 minutes to look up "genocide convention" to find out that it's not the Geneva Convention.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You clearly don't know what you are talking about. The genocide convention (not the geneva convention) that the US signed legally obliges them to act regardless of where the genocide is happening. Your logic is ridiculous because it would mean that any country only has an obligation to stop genocide if it occurs within their own borders.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

They do. But they ignore the genocide convention.