this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
162 points (95.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43426 readers
718 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This guy is 38 and she was part of some chatroom and he started talking to her 13 year old little sister in a way that very obviously had ill intent. She called him out on this and posted screenshots of that chatroom online. Now ever since this, he has a site where he archives almost everything she says online. She made a post about how she prefers cats over dogs, then he archived that and posted the link to the archive on his site saying "never trust a dog hater with anything" and it just goes on, and on, and on for years.

When she even makes a passing mention about him, even if he's not named or only vaguely mentioned, he chimes in, and posts a link to his site with some variation of "don't trust her, she's not to be trusted" and links to pages on his site which were all made by him over the years in an attempt to maliciously discredit her. It's often a gish-gallop of links.

He also says that he's made an account on every site he knows of, likely in an attempt at surveilling or intimidating her.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] troed@fedia.io 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's indeed - and unique enough that you should be able to find me in seconds.

Feel free to call the Swedish police and tell them that you don't like my arguments. Or for that matter, Jerry (who runs fedia.io).

I guess you realized you couldn't counter my actual point.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What's your point, that you'll gladly sacrifice your stated beliefs, completely contradicting everything you said previously, if you think it will help you win an argument? You should be a politician.

It's hilarious how flippant you are here about calling the police or "Jerry" when you were previously so adamant about that being the best way for this woman to protect herself, proving exactly why that was a nonsense solution to begin with. Congratulations for completely demolishing your argument all on your own.

[–] troed@fedia.io 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure you've understood what you've read so far.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I've understood it quite well thank you. I would also be quite embarrassed making a chain of comments like yours, so I also understand why you're now deflecting away from the topic and pretending like we're talking about something else.

[–] troed@fedia.io 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Ah ok. It looked like you tried to claim that reciting three facts from your public comments here was in anyway similar to what the topic of the thread is about - but I agree that even an american can't be that ignorant.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm really interested in hearing your explanation for how it's any different.

OP claims this stalker is also reciting facts from their public comments in an attempt to antagonize them too. I suppose you feel it's okay for you to do it though since you seem to think you're on some sort of moral high ground and "it's different when I do it," "this person really deserves it," or whatever justification you need to tell yourself to clear the cognitive dissonance.

[–] troed@fedia.io 1 points 15 hours ago

You might need to retake English classes.