this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
111 points (95.9% liked)

World News

51374 readers
1643 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US is moving to reclaim the Bagram airbase from the Taliban after losing it during the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, Donald Trump announced.

“We’re trying to get it back, by the way,” Mr Trump told reporters during a joint press conference with Sir Keir Starmer in Aylesbury on Thursday.

The Bagram base was the largest operated by the US in Afghanistan and is strategically important in countering China’s growing influence in the region.

Mr Trump suggested that he was negotiating with the Taliban to retake ownership, adding: “We’re trying to get it back because they need things from us. We want that base back.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Your not wrong is the Pakistani interference but that doesn't remotely change the fact that the mujahedeen whos direct successors were funded by America, bin laden as you say was a middle man between Saudi and and America for money yet to claim it's more due to Pakistan? Every lead goes back to America and American funding and American ideology, Pakistans funding of Afghani extremist is in line with us doctrine for the region even when Afghanistan had a democratic leader and a functional military it chose not to support them and instead radicals from the countryside

But you are absolutely right about Saudis funding extremism, wanna guess who propped up the tiny little emirate of Saud into controlling most of the Arabian peninsula? Or how the saud leadership who funded this were directly couped in by America against the former Saudi leader? As a former Muslim I'm fully aware of how evil the Arabian peninsula states are and how fucked Pakistan became under Zia al huq, but that doesn't even remotely change the fact that the leader of all of this was still America and it's idealistic Monroe doctrine