this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
68 points (78.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34855 readers
8 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you are just going to reject one of the biggest driving forces of human beings, then you don't want a serious discussion.

Greed is absolutely part of it, people want to maximize their gains, be it money, health, security or resources.


But since you don't accept that answer, what is your explanation for a refugee that keeps walking through safe country after safe country before finally finding the specific country they accept?

Why should refugees get to pick and choose a specific EU country to live in?

Why would legitimate refugees's discard their papers?

[–] kjo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

what is your explanation for a refugee that keeps walking through safe country after safe country before finally finding the specific country they accept?

Huh? Because it is safe obviously. Everyone wants a better chance of better living. And refugees are already moving. Since they are already moving why not move to a country with better chance of better living? If they hear "so-and-so country has better chance of better living" of course they are going to choose that, again, because they are already moving.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I didn't say greed can't be part of it, but anti immigration folks position it as the primary or significant motivator, but:
If they were primarily motivated by greed, the would have immigrated long ago.
And their objection seems to be primarily motivated by greed, the want more and they perceive that immigrants will prevent them from getting more. So why is their greed ok but immigrant greed isn't?

What is my explanation? I don't need one, you're the one saying it's greed, it's up to you to prove that in the face of an entirely reasonable counterargument.
But I'll give you one anyways - they're looking for a place that they can belong, which isn't necessarily going to be the first place they arrive. They're looking for the ability to support their family, which isn't greed.
Why shouldn't refugees get to pick what country they move to, like any EU citizen can?

Why would legitimate refugees discard their papers? You tell me, why would having papers be worse than not having papers? That practically screams that something is either very wrong with the system, or that this is simply a dishonest claim.