this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
4893 readers
180 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Very good, but I disagree about Substack or Rumble. These are right wing platforms that amplify right wing content, not some neutral ground. They ate censorship free to allow for extreme right but they will not promote left content the same way.
I'm sorry but that's just wrong. I've been writing on Substack for 2 years now and the majority of that site is left-leaning or left-wing people. Content creators and regular readers. Just my newsletter has gone from 400 to 1,580 in a year.
Even if it was, and the case for Rumble, I do not agree with this notion that because it is dominant with the right that it can't be used if its a low-censorship site with no specific political devotion. You're just arguing to leave spaces online untouched by our infiltration and means to radicalize people away from reactionary backwardness, which is basically a spit in the face to what Mao said. We did that before irl and it's one of the biggest reasons the influence/power vacuum in rural communities openned up and was quickly influenced by far-right efforts to divide political beliefs between the cities (left) and rural communities (right) - that tactic is so well known its mentioned by the far-right in their own propaganda.
And I gave my Rumble as an example, I've got blatant left-wing content on there, I just don't post video stuff consistently and don't have the tech yet to do streaming (despite I plan to). https://rumble.com/c/c-2318824
Rumble has such a low censorship that I uploaded blatant Hamas propaganda to test the waters and it's still up: https://rumble.com/v4ltle2-our-beloved-ones-by-shadi-al-bourini-palestine-resistance.html
Like I said at the bottom of the article: "We need entry points, propaganda spreaders, into every space across the internet. Nothing should be out of our reach."
Substack:
Thank you for the list of people, some I follow, some new ones I need to follow.