this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
616 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

75758 readers
2375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 97 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Haha! Do it if the EU does not give up on their Orwellian control!

Wait, I'm in the EU and I use Signal!

[–] jali67@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why are so many European countries doing this? Why the sudden push for chat control and internet restriction laws?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It's understandable from law enforcement perspective that it's important to snoop on actual criminal communications. The EU has pretty reasonable measures and good at cracking down on continental-wide criminal activities. However, can we trust authorities that they won't over reach with the chat control and violate privacy and freedom of speech? Like, come on, nothing good ever came from spying on communications. Catching criminals and/or terrorists is a convenient excuse to spy on dissidents.

We've seen it happen in America with the PATRIOT Act. People dismissed the opposition to it with "nothing to hide" thought terminating cliche, or accuse you of pedophile or terrorist for not wanting spying on communications. Then twenty years later, Americans have a fascist government who allowed a corporate asshole to steal information from the federal government. And those information will be used for surveillance capitalism. The same will happen to us in the EU if we don't push back hard on this Orwellian desires of politicians.

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 76 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Basically, but what you forget is that Signal is also the standard for every Politician for their group chats because it's secure, so the idea that they might lose their secure, leak-free* form of communication should worry MEPs and other politicians into taking action. Will it? I don't know, politicians are very stupid when it comes to tech it seems.

* Baring screenshots

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

politicians are very stupid when it comes to tech it seems.

They are so so so stupid, about this.

There will be so much blackmail and ruined political careers if these backdoors get installed.

A backdoor is never solely used by the folks one might hope would use it.

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 13 hours ago

I'm sure some poor Civil Servant has had to sit one of them down and explain why it's a bad idea to them, only be told to stfu with the most stupid excuse ever, leading to them putting their head in their hands and sobbing.

[–] teotwaki@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's an explicit clause that exempts politicians from the ban. They get privacy because they need it, but nobody else does.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 14 hours ago

That's completely backwards. The the extent we give people authority, they must also accept monitoring, so we know they aren't abusing that authority.

Ooh how convenient.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Screenshots, or just adding a journalist to the group chat.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Screenshots, or just adding a journalist to the group chat.

no software can prevent PEBKAC errors. It's like locking a door and then giving the key to a thief and being shocked when people steal your shit

[–] Corridor8031@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

where are the companys lobbying against this btw?? i mean it is their data they will be leaked aswell

[–] yogurt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If they can lobby they'll just lobby to get all their competitors' data after it passes.

That is also a good point. Generally this is dangerous for all and sundry.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would they care about leaks? I guess that's some missed profit on selling the data, but that's only if there's a breach.

[–] Corridor8031@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

i mean like company espionage and similar threats than leaked user data...