this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
456 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

18335 readers
741 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/36272492

Europe’s richest man, the luxury goods magnate Bernard Arnault, has said that a wealth tax that could cost him more than €1bn (£817m) would be deadly for France’s economy.

The French founder of LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton said in a statement to the Sunday Times that calls for a 2% wealth tax on all assets “aims to destroy the liberal economy, the only one that works for the good of all”.

The idea of a wealth tax has steadily gained ground in France because of a political crisis, with the government trying to push through unpopular budget cuts. The idea of a 2% wealth tax on fortunes worth more than €100m has been proposed by Gabriel Zucman, an economics professor who has become a household name in France.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

and in other "news", men who had exclusive-of-all-non-men rights, have asserted that allowing women to have civil-rights, would be bad, too..

and white-supremacists have asserted that allowing non-whites any validity would be bad, too..

Duh!

Rigged-privilege protects itself, using all ideological disinformation it can!

it always has, it always will.


But why would this be deadly for the overall, if it removes feudalism/oligarchism's validity/economic-might/rights-are-exclusive-of-the-regular-citizenry paradigm?

Gaslighters need to be controlled/limited, not platformed/boosted/validated.

Read the important "Screwed" by Thom Hartmann, for REAL and ACTUALLY EVIDENCE-BASED economics..

Here's a not-affiliate link to the actual book, so hopefully you can read a sample & begin understanding why I'm recommending it.

https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/screwed-47

I'd tried understanding economics for decades and something was "off" about everything the textbooks were pushing, which got clarified in Hartmann's book, right up front.

Economic-strength is citizenry based, and NOT mere-wealth/stocks based!!

Duh!, right?

But until Hartmann's book, I'd not seen the correct framing for economic-strength, in ANY book on economics!

Sad, and true.

Get clear understanding: it de-stresses one's view, & therefore one's whole mode of living, to good extent!

_ /\ _