this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
530 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

75792 readers
2480 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I think the fad will die down a bit, when companies figure out that AI will be more likely than humans to make very expensive mistakes that the company has to compensate, and saying it was the AI is not a valid cop out.
I foresee companies will go bankrupt on that account.

It doesn't help to save $100k on cutting away an employee, if the AI causes damages for 10 or 100 times that amount.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When the bubble bursts, whoever is left standing is going to have to jack prices through the roof to put so much as a dent in their outlay. Their outlay so far. Can't see many companies hanging in there at that point.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not if the IP is purchased by another company leaving the original saddled with the debt, or spun off so the parent company can rebuy it thusly, or the government bails them out, or buys it to be the State AI too, or a bunch of other scenarios in this dark new world ahead.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

That’s my favorite part. All the stolen IP.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

I put my money on AI act here in Europe and the willingness of local authorities to make a few examples. That would help bringing some accountability here and there and stir a bit the pot. Eventually, as AI commodities, it will be less in the light. That will also help.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Agreed, but I do think that some jobs are just going to be gone.

For example, low level CS agents. I worked for a company that replaced that first line of CS defense with a bot, and the end-of-call customer satisfaction scores went up.

I can think of a few other things in my company that had a similar outcome. If the role is gone, and the customers and employees are being served even better than when they had that support role, that role ain’t coming back.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 16 hours ago

Oh 100%. The question will be are there more opportunities that come from it. Here’s my guess: if you can’t produce something interesting you will be fighting for scraps. Even that might not be good enough.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure that even consumer services is an area where I saw a computer made an expensive mistake, promising the customer something very expensive, and a court decided the company had to honor the agreement the AI made. But I can't find the story, because I'm flooded with product placement articles about how wonderful AI is at saving cost in CS.
But yes CS is absolutely an area where AI is massively pushed.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 16 hours ago

The court honored it for now. I expect the future it will be your problem.

Oh but the EU?

Once they are done with North America the EU will be a non issue for them.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure if it's the one you are referring to, but AI gave discounts on flights.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

No it was a single case of reparation for damages of some sort. Where the company wouldn't honor the deal, but lost the case in court.

But thanks for finding a concrete example of how AI makes stupid mistakes, this Airline case looks like the bot suffered from the infamous hallucinations they are prone to.

And it's absolutely disgusting that the airline won't honor it, and instead make all sorts of claims about how when and where the complaint needs to be filed.

Very good example of the principle of what I meant, although it's only a few hundred dollars.