this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
196 points (98.5% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1532 readers
414 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I was just perusing the modlog when I noticed something interesting. Apparently posting news about Gaza/Palestine is not allowed on !worldnews@sh.itjust.works. I decided to check the side bar and didn't see anything. The only pinned post also does not indicate that this is not allowed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

How do banned mods expect to defend themselves?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

They can make an alt for this specific purpose, or ask someone to post for them.

[–] cielkorpo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I banned them instance-wide months ago, not just after this post to stop them defending themselves, and not specifically for this community; we have allowed mods on alts before to speak if they were banned on their main, but i think this is a very, very clear case of PTB. They deny the genocide blatantly, and in general has spouted pretty disgusting bullshit.

As for the genocide denial claim, check out this thread. https://lemmy.world/comment/19713120 (Deleted comments but check modlogs). They have also used "genocide" in quotes. If all of this doesn't make them a zionist, i do not know what does.

Also small bonus, I was in a thread with another zionist once (in that thread that person went mask off and called me and all arabs subhuman, and was just horribly racist in general) and ikt refuted my "all arab populations support palestine" claim, i am literally in the middle east lmao, didn't know i actually needed a racist from australia to tell me true reality 😂 they were banned at the time so i did not see their gold reply, but i just discovered it in the modlog lol

In short, this asshole has nothing to defend since they've made their positions very clear. I don't want somebody like them on our instance, even on alt; just to spew hateful rhetoric in "defense" of themselves.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

that's certainly the modlog history.

I'm sure you want to correct the record in this thread that I'm unrelated to ikt's actions. There are more comments referencing me than there are comments referencing ikt.

[–] cielkorpo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah i noticed, even after the spat between dbzer0 and mog i do not think you had anything to do with this, since checking the comm modlog it was clearly all by ikt, who as i've described is a huge piece of shit; and you've abandoned that community anyway checking the "asking for mods" post. I'll talk to the other mods about this

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I also notice that this post doesn't meet the posting guidelines

  • There's no mod/admin listed

  • There are only removed posts, no banned users.

  • There's no screenshot showing the mod name

  • There's an explanation for each removal

  • There's no explanation as to why this is unfair.

It also doesn't meet some of the rules:

  • Quill didn't receive any of these mod actions.

  • There are no mod names attached

  • The accused PTB also can't respond

Browsing through some of the posts across this community, very few actually meet the guidelines and rules. For the sake of transparency and the purpose of this community, shouldn't the standards be much higher?

[–] Blaze@lazysoci.al 1 points 6 minutes ago

There are only removed posts, no banned users.

Doesn't that fall under "other sanctions"?

What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?

Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.

[–] cielkorpo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Huh, i actually didn't notice. I mostly only moderate on this community when it's breaking of instance rules or clear spam, but i leave the actual moderation per comm guidelines to Unruffled or db0. I didn't even know we have a 'accused PTB can't respond' rule lol, but i have only banned their main, and it was a couple of months ago, unrelated to this post.

But yea you raise a good point. @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com @Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com what do you two think ?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago) (1 children)

You should aim to follow the sidebar rules .

There is no "accused PTB can't respond". I don't know what either of you are talking about. We explicitly allow PTBs to respond. Just not by opening new threads about it.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

Yeah, but what about the majority of posts made in this community not actually following these guidelines and rules?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago) (1 children)

I'm not as anal about rules like other mods. I understand that people often don't see the sidebars and mistakes happen easily. So long as things tend to follow the spirit of the comm, I tend to let things go or just ask the OP to amend their post. The rules are there to help people follow the spirit of the comm.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

do you think this community will accept if a moderator featured in this community used your comment as an excuse for their moderation?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago) (1 children)

It depends? I think you're still under the mistaken idea that this comm judges mods on how well they follow their printed rules, rather than how much of a power-trippin' bastard they're being. A mod can have bastardly written rules and follow them to a T and we'd still call them bastards for having such rules.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 minutes ago (1 children)

such as you banning users for being libs?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

Why did I just know you were simply building up to a gotcha 🙄

If you feel I'm being a PTB, make a post about it in this comm.