this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
68 points (85.4% liked)
Ye Power Trippin' Bastards
1554 readers
90 users here now
This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.
Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.
Posting Guidelines
All posts should follow this basic structure:
- Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
- What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
- Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
- Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
- Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.
Rules
- Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.
- Don’t use private communications to prove your point. We can’t verify them and they can be faked easily.
- Don’t deobfuscate mod names from the modlog with admin powers.
- Don’t harass mods or brigade comms. Don’t word your posts in a way that would trigger such harassment and brigades.
- Do not downvote posts if you think they deserved it. Use the comment votes (see below) for that.
- You can post about power trippin’ in any social media, not just lemmy. Feel free to post about reddit or a forum etc.
- If you are the accused PTB, while you are welcome to respond, please do so within the relevant post.
Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.
Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.
YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.
Some acronyms you might see.
- PTB - Power-Tripping Bastard: The commenter agrees with you this was a PTB mod.
- YDI - You Deserved It: The commenter thinks you deserved that mod action.
- YDM new - You Deserved More: The commenter thinks you got off too lightly.
- BPR - Bait-Provoked Reaction: That mod probably overreacted in charged situation, or due to being baited.
- CLM - Clueless Mod: The mod probably just doesn't understand how their software works.
Relevant comms
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't see how that news would NOT be US internal news. Mods are just enforcing the rules.
YDI.
Because they don't have a rule against US internal news.
Once upon a time, I was an actual copy editor and worked in an actual news room, that printed actual physical papers.
I would, and back a while ago, did argue that something like this is so potentially impactful to the entire world, that it is in fact 'world news', as in, news that is generally quite important to readers from anywhere, that is shaping or may shape the course of world history.
'US Internal News' is not defined or explained at all within the rules, beyond just literally that phrase.
By the logic of 'it happens entirely within the US, so its internal US News'... a US Presidential election outcome is not world news, 9/11 (as it happened in real time) would not be world news, a theoretical military coup/counter coup in the US would not be world news.
This is a dumb way to try to draw this totally arbitrary and editorial line.
Rules can in fact be stupid themselves.
I again emphasize that this in a unique editorial decision, made by almost certainly one particular mod who is currently facing many calls to resign or be removed from being a lemmy.world World News mod, by at least one other former lemmy.world mod, for being capricious, petty and arbitrary.
Fair, but I would disagree.
I don't think that's a problem. Just use your best judgment. If the mod disagrees, they'll remove the post and we can all move on, no harm done.
Some US department making rules for journalist isn't a presidential election or 9/11 ... ridiculous comparison.
Sure. I personally think the rule is stupid and a community named "world news" shouldn't exclude a part of the world. But that's not how lemmy works.
If the people running this community want to have that rule they can and they can enforce it as they see fit. And removing this particular post is, in my opinion, way within a reasonable interpretation of that rule. So there is no power tripping.
... No harm done?
That post, the discussion was active and lively, many people wanted to see this, talk about it, upvoted it pretty darn fast, and then... removed, gone.
At least one commenter in that thread said that they hoped the overly stringent restrictions on what counts as a valid news source in that comm would be relaxed and not lead to the post being removed... ah, but, got removed for another reason I guess.
Sorry no.
World News on lemmy.world is the largest and most active lemmy news community, full stop.
It having dumb rules that are enforced arbitrarily by a controversial power tripping mod who is very often featured in this comm for a variety of indefensible bullshit is a big deal, in almost exactly the same way that journalists being restricted from reporting on government agencies/activities is.
Ok and here is where I just laugh at you.
Its not some random department.
It is the fucking Pentagon, the Department of ~~Defense~~ War.
The organization that controls the most wide reaching military on the planet, with over 120 bases in I think we are up to almost 50 different countries now.
If the Pentagon changes its rules to say 'you can only report what clears 100% through us', then thats almost 50 different countries that now lose a whole lot of journalistic access to what is going on or likely to go on in their country.
Beyond that, it also might be nice for say, Venzuelans, to be able to access US journos who have access to the Pentagon, to see if maybe their fishing boats are still gonna keep being blown up for no reason, or if the US is just gonna invade their whole country.
You... apparently do not have this... context in mind, when you act like there is no comparison to the other examples I gave, where you are here acting like literally the largest comm on lemmy is... just some little niche community?
As I already said, I think the rule is dumb as well. But a dumb rule existing isn't mods power tripping. This is just us not liking a rule.
And not sure what the size of the community matters. In fact, have you considered that it maybe got so big because it's the only one not full of US internal news? Some people might really like that.
I don't see it as big of a deal (other communities exist). But if you want to discuss the merit of the rule or the individual conduct of the moderators, that feels more like it should be a meta-post in the community itself.
This post here is about whether or not this specific mod action was warranted. And I still think it absolutely was.
Yes, everybody is aware how big and important America is. And yes, the current administration is speedrunning the one remaining superpower towards fascism, which is bad for all of the world. By that logic almost everything this administration does would be "world news". But that's obviously a silly way to look at it.
Its my post.
You don't get to piegon-hole frame my post.
This comm often serves as a place for such meta discussion, we can talk about related multiple things at the same time.
Or, well, maybe we can't, I guess, if you are apparently in charge of conversation framing here.
Anyway...
... who do you think writes the rules?
Are... are you serious right now?
Its the mods, in case you need a direct answer to that.
Yeah its for US based normie reddit refugees that by default land on lemmy.world, who want a US news vs not US dichotomy, its not actually primarily intended to have an actual global perspective, its intended to have a US centric, non-US News differentiation, because the vast majority of the lemmy.world user base is from the US, and that's whose being catered to.
This is an editorial approach that centers the US as the default given, and works from there.
It is not an editorial approach that attempts to consider what global or worldwide audiences from anywhere would find noteworthy and important.
Again, cool, neat rhetotical device, but we are not talking about anything the admin does, we are talking about things that do obviously have a direct impact on other countries, via, you know, aforementioned literally physically present military assets in up to 50 other countries, and how any one is to have any idea what they may or may not be doing.
... You sure do seem to talk and argue just like jordan, anyone ever said that to you before?
... who is us?
Who... what group are you referring to here?
They are inconsistant with the rules
What you expect jl to remember rules???
Apparently you don't know JordanLund. If you did, you could base this entirely on your opinion of him and not at all on the facts themselves.
Great advice right here. Who needs facts if you have opinions!
Still is a rule 1 violation and you're still using your .world account. You're not concerned their selectively mute admins enable him?