this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
252 points (98.8% liked)

World News

50445 readers
2429 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"gen z" is not an applicable term for young people outside the US.

[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

it very much applies in my non-US country

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 days ago

it very much not applies to mine

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

because the conditions that made the "baby boomers" or the characteristic "millennials" are almost exclusive to the post-ww2 economic boom in the US.

gen-z is just a name that describes young people. why not just say young people instead of making up generational war nicknames?

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No term will ever satisfy everyone. And everyone knows who "gen z" refers to. I'll not let your semantic wars ruin my day... which is so xennial of me 👓

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

i just don't want this generational divide getting to people. (and it's probably not just young people)

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're a drop in the ocean fighting an ancient war. Let it go and be free.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

not ancient. propagandizing younger generations to weaponize juvenoia is a very recent thing, if you were born in the last 50 years you can remember it, as i do.

we can be better and not help further this suspicious ass agenda.

[–] randomblock1@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You could make that case for the boomers, but with the advent of the Internet it's not really limited to specific countries anymore. Gen z just describes people who grew up with some access to the internet, but not to the extent of alpha. A large part of these recent revolts were caused or accelerated by social media. Gen Z is more specific than young people, and in this case also more culturally relevant.

Doesn't matter anyway, even if you think Gen Z isn't real you know what age range the article is talking about.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

historically it's always young people and minorities (of any age) that go out to fuck things up. they are the ones who get the most fucked after all. no need to make generational divides out of it though, it's not just them getting the short end of the stick.

and not just genz grew up with internet, it's just that they are the young ones still. shitty fucking propaganda tbh.