Progressive Politics

3392 readers

949 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TokenBoomer@lemmy.world

238

[Video] Kamala Harris becomes visibly shaken and furious after being called a “right-wing war criminal” (i.imgur.com)

submitted 6 days ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

500 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Outright

So you're saying you know exactly how greater her loss would have been if she didn't stand up for human rights? If you know that since outright loss means, never had a chance. So since she didn't outright loss what did she need to do to get more votes from the right or left?

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

2nd definition- instantaneously was that really hard to placein context?

Do you need someone to explain to you that taking the less popular opinion will not make it more likely for her to win?

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do you know what first past the poll means? Go watch school house rock.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Did you mean first past the post? That's not as much of a factor as the pro-Israel position was the more popular position and thus more likely to gain votes.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Popular on the right and center. Not the progressive base. So she would have lost by now votes is your unsubstantiated claim. Okay... So by losing more and would have lost more of the presidency? Are you saying winning by 1 vote or 1 million isn't the same in our system?