this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
1268 points (99.5% liked)

World News

50445 readers
2154 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As Ireland's $1,500-a-month basic income pilot program for creatives nears its end in February, officials have to answer a simple question: Is it worth it?

With four months to go, they say the answer is yes.

Earlier this month, Ireland's government announced its 2026 budget, which includes "a successor to the pilot Basic Income Scheme for the Arts to begin next year" among its expenditures.

Ireland is just one of many places experimenting with guaranteed basic income programs, which provide recurring, unrestricted payments to people in a certain demographic. These programs differ from a universal basic income, which would provide payments for an entire population.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

that's unfair. what classifies as "art"? am i an artist? I'm not sure.

i think a major point of the UBI scheme was the broad democratic support because everyone benefits from it. if only a specific group of people gets it, that's just another way to split the society. not what we need.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

that’s unfair.

Crabs in a Bucket

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

This program has been terminated by Irish Arts minister Bucket O'Crabs.

haha yeah :) but no, actually, i want them to have UBI, i just want everyone else to have it as well :) that's a difference.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

also by the way what i find interesting is that UBI wouldn't actually have to pay for 100% of people's living expenses. imagine i get a $100, then i'm gonna spend $30 of that on food at a nearby restaurant, so the chef and waiters are gonna get money, which they then spend again ... what i'm saying is that $1 in UBI does far more than $1, because people are gonna spend it and then other people are gonna have it ... so you probably need to pay far less than 100% of living expenses, only like maybe 30% could be enough.

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or less. Alaska's dividend program is a couple thousand a year and significantly reduces its poverty rate.

Defining living expenses is tough. If everyone is homeless, getting them a studio or tiny house seems basic, but if everyone is in a studio, getting them into a one bedroom seems basic. If everyone struggles to get enough clean water to drink, having water for drinking and washing seems basic, but if everyone has plenty of wash water then they want pools and irrigated golf courses. The way human brains are programmed with a hedonistic treadmill means we will never feel like 100% of our living expenses are covered. But every sustainable bit of help we can set up society to deliver makes our society richer.

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

*hedonic treadmill.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago

Well, our current system is unfair. So you can get on board with helping struggling artists, or you could rather more people struggle.

If this scheme works out, it doesn't take much to think this could be applied to more and more groups.

It has to start somewhere, and opposing this because it doesn't immediately include everyone is short sighted and selfish imo. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good here.

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It gets even more unfair: participants get selected by chance (if they fulfill the criteria)

BUT it's just a pilot project. I hope it's successful and gets implemented for everyone - I mean everyone has the potential to become an artist if money isn't the deciding factor anymore.

Who knows how many great musicians, painter, etc. are stuck in a 9-5 job? I for example want to create a game... Not really "art" in the classical sense, but creative and prone to bring me next to no money unless I have a lot of luck.

Hell, even scientists might be more free in what they want to study if money is less of a problem...

UBI might be a great thing and I agree that art isn't the only thing that could benefit from it.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

How many great artists, thinkers, and other potential geniuses are actually out there in the world, but they were unable to fulfill their potential because they had to struggle just to survive?

Imagine how many Ramanujans are actually out there, unable to do what they're great at because they're being crushed by the capitalist machine.

[–] linguinus@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

"Art" is such an interesting notion. I think it's safe to say that we currently call people "artists" if they're able to commodify their creative output. Whereas in reality, all humans are capable of creative expression. You are an artist. We all are. And UBI should be given to everybody!

[–] ThelastfingerofH@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I would guess, it means you have an art degree or something of the sort.