this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
179 points (99.4% liked)

World News

50445 readers
2203 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/51328301

The Culture Committee of the Chamber of Deputies on Wednesday approved an amendment to Education Minister Giuseppe Valditara’s “informed consent” bill, extending the current ban on sex education from kindergartens and primary schools to middle schools (ages 11 to 14).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gympie_Gympie_pie@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not Italy, just the Meloni government. Italian people are fed up with her.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

This is true for nearly all cases of government critique. However, it's also true that any country/nation electing a certain government is at least partially responsible for their actions. Naturally, we can argue about the degree, since it is not clear how open and effective elections are.

Apart from that, we generally say "[country] x does [thing y]" and not "[this specific government] consisting of [parties a, b and c], from [country x] does [thing y]" for simplicity. Most people only really care about their own country, its neighbors and the three superpowers. It's not exactly easy remembering several political parties, various individual politicians, and what they all say and do from 193+ countries.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

40% of Italians still like her according to polls...

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

50% of people are below average intelligence.

(Yeah, yeah, the implied conclusion is fallacious reasoning, but it's still funny.)

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking about this the other day, and due to the bell curve, 68% of people are average intelligence, with only 16% being below (or above) average. I don't know if that makes it better or worse, because a lot more than 16% of the population is making pretty poor choices.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure cognitive scientists had good reasons for that somewhat arbitrarily defined band of the bell-curve when they gave it the name "average intelligence" but it's pretty clear that the joke isn't using that definition.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First, if there's a good reason, it isn't arbitrary. Second, at an elementary level, data points that are within a standard deviation of each other are statistically similar. There are obviously variances and edge cases, but it does reinforce the point I was making, which is that expected behavior for someone at 115 IQ and someone at 100 IQ are more or less the same (and may be the same person who did or didn't have a good night's sleep).

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 1 points 21 hours ago

As you point out, intelligence is fuzzy and dependent on many factors. Which is why a straight line hard cut-off above and below the mean of a distribution seems pretty arbitrary to me, even if it is based upon a particularly useful way of delineating variance from a mean.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

If you take out the malicious, you're left with only the dumb ones.