this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
727 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

76274 readers
2941 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] kungen@feddit.nu 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AWS doesn't go down that often to impact such decisions I wouldn't think... I think it's more likely that these companies calculated that AWS isn't worth the price for their workloads?

I've been at several companies where just a day's worth of their AWS costs would be able to finance significantly stronger compute/storage, in addition to an administration team for all that. (Of course it's not that simple, but you get what I mean)

[โ€“] VivianRixia@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago

You pay a premium for the privilege of blaming someone else when the servers go down.