this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
319 points (97.1% liked)

World News

50432 readers
2513 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Those charged with terrorism for supporting Palestine Action will have no jury in trials limited to 36 minutes each, with prison sentences up to six months. These are the plans for Starmer Courts for mass trials of anti-Genocide protestors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

already a decade ago there was no right to have a lawyer present when detained and interrogated at an airport

That's been true in the US for decades, and most other countries. Border control is administrative, it isn't a legal proceeding.

Though I wonder if you're thinking of Blair's "reform" that eliminated the right of silence when being questioned? Well, you can still be silent, but they can hold it against you.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Maybe, I lived in the UK when that stuff was changed but it's been a while and I'm probably a bit off on the details.

At the time there was some outrage because it suspended rights which were widely believed to be fundamental over there.