this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
358 points (98.9% liked)

Selfhosted

52619 readers
1010 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Has this impacted your self hosted instances of Immich? Are you hosting Immich via subdomain?

Related:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The issue they had was being marked as phishing, not the SSL certificate warning page.

Have you seen what browsers say when you have a look at the SSL certificate warning page?

It is for pull requests. A user makes a change to the documentation, they want to be able to see the changes on a web page.

Why is a user made PR publishing a branch to Immich's domain for the user to see?

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought that was how pull requests worked, its a branch if you'veade a departure to edit code, you have the pull request and ask them to merge into the main branch. It should be visible to everyone so everyone can review the change.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 days ago

The branch for the PR shouldn't be hosted on the production site's domain, and that deployment that the company will be testing and reviewing shouldn't be accessible to the public. They even have internal in the URL, while being accessible by external people lol