this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
746 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

18480 readers
1972 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Johnson and Johnson, accusing the pharmaceutical company of failing to warn consumers about the risk of taking Tylenol while pregnant.

This lawsuit, the first of its kind from a state government, comes a month after President Donald Trump and U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced updated guidance discouraging pregnant women from taking acetaminophen, citing it as a possible cause of autism. The announcement set off a wave of controversy in the health care community, and confusion among pregnant women unsure how they should manage fever and pain during pregnancy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Weirdmusic@lemmy.world 227 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Are fucking insane? How on earth do they expect to actually win this lawsuit?

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 185 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They don't. It's part flood the zone, part pandering to certain voters. Look what we do for you! A blue state wouldn't fight for your health like this!

Nothing will come of it but it's a positive distraction from the extraction of wealth that is currently happening.

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's also a very obvious distraction from

THE EPSTEIN FILES

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It is a distraction from the hostile fascist takeover of our country. The Epstein shit is a distraction from that.

[–] Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Fascism is a systemic issue. It's a cancer that takes roots when democracy starts failing.

Having the concrete and unsystemic problem of there being probable cause Trump did some very, very bad things looked into properly is a much smaller ask.

However, even that's an imposibility in today's world.

I'd love to have a magic cure for fascism. There is one, although it's undoubtedly very unmagic: Painstakingly dealing with obvious lies and crimes, one at a time. Respecting the Constitution. Having people be truly equal. Especially in the eyes of the law.

Without a thourough dose of said cure, fascism will hide away and get ready to rise back up.

The Epstein shit is one step of a bajillion mile journey. It's not the first and it's not the last. But without it, there's no journey to be had.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's not "fascist", it's ultracapitalist....

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

As someone on the outside looking in, it is ABSOLUTELY INSANE that this still needs to be explained to people.

[–] thelivefive@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well maybe something will come from it, it might inspire laws that make it harder to sue pharma.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 9 hours ago

I'm not sure if you're saying this a good thing or a bad thing?

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

People have tried in the past and each time it got thrown out because the judges ruled they were full of shit. As recently as 2023, even, from Reuters:

Cote, in a 148-page ruling, found that none of the five expert witnesses proposed by the plaintiffs had offered a sound scientific methodology to support their opinion that Tylenol's active ingredient, acetaminophen, could cause autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

"Instead, the unstructured approach adopted by the plaintiffs' experts permitted cherry-picking, allowed a results-driven analysis, and obscured the complexities, inconsistencies, and weaknesses in the underlying data," she wrote.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Wait, so this "Tylenol cause autism" thing existed prior to this year?

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

It was around in 2022, at least in this iteration, when they consolidated a bunch of cases. The mommy wellness blog machine kicked off hard. Retailers like Walmart were sued too, because people are fucking dumb as rocks.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago

"Vaccines cause autism" was the hit in 2020

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're trying to sue J&J, too. One of the largest corporations in the world. Curious to see where it'll go. Just seems like all it'll do is piss off his donors.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago

Tylenol is made by Kenvue, an independant company spun off by J&J in 2022.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Honestly they probably expect a settlement to avoid “political trouble.”

This is how recent federal lawsuits ended.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are the betting markets on how big Tylenol’s donation to trumps library will be?

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

By convincing a jury of normal Americans they're right.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They could request a bench trial. No jury, just the judge.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Go with the ~98% chance of a conservative judge deciding ? Bold move.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

It works for patents, surely it'll work for lunatic bullshit

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

Why wouldn't they? Reality can be anything in Trump's America.