this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
514 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

76415 readers
3523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
514
Study Boldly Claims 4K And 8K TVs Aren't Much Better Than HD To Your Eyes, But Is It True? (hothardware.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by artifex@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
307 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A new study published in Nature by University of Cambridge researchers just dropped a pixelated bomb on the entire Ultra-HD market, but as anyone with myopia can tell you, if you take your glasses off, even SD still looks pretty good :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not as much, but yes. However, it may be because now I'm actively looking for the difference after this thread, hehe.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah... we have a 55" 4K tv, and from across the room you sort of have to squint to tell the difference between 4K and 1080p, up close sure, but I don't watch screens that big from that close.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Next year, when our house construction is completed, I need to choose 2 new TVs, an 85 and a 65. At this point I'm looking for longevity more than all the marketing sticker BS being pushed now. I will probably go with a couple of Scepter non-smart TVs and just keep running my media from Jellyfin with a couple of NUCs attached to them, hehe.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The closest thing to "Smart TVs" in our home are Blu-Ray players, and they've never been network connected.

I like the ViewSonics we have, and we've had a series of NUCs over the years, but lately I'm finding that the N100/N150 fanless PCs like this are perfectly capable of HTPC duty: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CWV439YW

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, I've been weighing those as options too. Great little media centers for little money and lots of privacy.