this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
975 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

76415 readers
3523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bobo@lemmy.world 61 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

The fact that some videos remain does not mean that some videos haven't been removed

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

just because a couple were removed doesn’t mean they were removed because of that….
if thousands of videos exist like that, they’re clearly not removing all videos like that.

[–] bobo@lemmy.world 0 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago) (1 children)

There isn't a claim being made that all videos showing circumvention of the Microsoft account requirement for Windows 11 installation are being taken down. Only some of them. You saying "people will just believe anything that fits their worldview" sounds like you're asserting that no takedowns are occurring. Thank you for clarifying that this is not actually your position.

The likelihood is that that this is being done automatically by youtube's AI, rather than because of requests by Microsoft. I think the real problem illustrated here is the lack of transparency when Youtube issues a takedown. An initial glance at Youtube's Community Guidelines doesn't seem to indicate a criterion by which a takedown would be automatically issued for such content, but I wonder if they're starting to automatically flag anything that might be considered circumvention guides. I had a private video taken down that I was sharing with a friend to show them how to use yt-dlp to extract audio from youtube videos and was given the same reason "harmful or dangerous content", which it clearly was not, but they're reluctant to explicitly say that they're removing videos that illustrate circumvention techniques. Yet another reason to stop using Youtube.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 minutes ago

there is no claim, it’s a link to a comment section that’s a link to another comment section

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I don’t understand their take at all.

“They haven’t gotten them all so THEY’RE NOT DOING IT IN THE FIRST PLACE so reactionary with your worldview JEEZ”

This is the kind of low-tier thinking that got us here in the first place.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

that’s not what reactionary even means, you zero tiered “thinker”