this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
44 points (94.0% liked)

Europe

7649 readers
837 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I don’t see any benefit watching a random youtuber / influencer make a video about this. We have actual journalists and newspapers who cover this in depth and with journalistic experience, research and integrity.

Try a popular national newspaper in your country, they will all have coverage. Or go on nos.nl and use deepl.com if you don’t speak dutch.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

a popular national newspaper in your country

Sure, i don't want to disagree,

We have actual journalists and newspapers who cover this in depth and with journalistic experience, research and integrity

But there are YouTubers and online influencers who qualify as 'actual journalist'. Sure this guy is pro-european and not unbiased, but to discard him as some random guy with a camera is really not fair.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

there are YouTubers and online influencers who qualify as 'actual journalist'. Sure this guy is pro-european and not unbiased, but to discard him as some random guy with a camera is really not fair

Well, can you find out who he is?

But I've seen his work for years, he's mostly been accurate, it's nice to have a pro-EU voice covering this and he usually links his sources in the video description, whereas none of the popular national newspapers where I live are pro-EU or properly citing sources, so they're painful to fact-check and sort opinion from fact.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

I actually tried to research him before I made my post, all I found is a vague one paragraph mission statement and him asking for donations. No backstory, no credentials no nothing.

I don’t even know if he ever attended history class or if he was home schooled by an evangelical cult in Louisiana. (I am exaggerating to make a point)

I know enough teens who get all their “news” from TikTok and YouTube without realizing that they are being influenced and don’t form their own opinions.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago)

I agree that when posting a YT link one can not assume " everyone knows that channel or that guy", or are like " ..but trust me bro." ai suggest that when posting a video link, one should consider providing some minimum context,or when in doubt a proper alt link with similar news info.

In this case, yes, the channel owner seems quite strict in his reporting methods. He divides facts and his opinion very clearly, so it is ok. These discussion can somewhat be avoided by providing context. / Edit

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 4 points 10 hours ago

I know enough teens who get all their “news” from TikTok and YouTube without realizing that they are being influenced

I agree this is a problem and it would be good for online media to make a statement somewhere about their background.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 9 hours ago

I actually tried to research him before I made my post, all I found is a vague one paragraph mission statement and him asking for donations. No backstory, no credentials no nothing.

That in itself isn't awful. If you try to research any random newspaper author, most have nothing much visible behind them except their past works. You may be able to see past jobs, but full credentials is rare.

I know enough boomers who get all their “news” from TV and newspapers without realizing that they are being influenced and don’t form their own opinions. I don't get the reverence for legacy media that gave us some truly awful past leaders and wars.

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 2 points 10 hours ago

People like to consume media in different ways does the format really matter?

It's not "just a random youtuber" many YouTube channels have teams of people and journalists working for them and deliver quality news.

newspapers, online-news, radio etc. All of them have biases.

Personally I like this format and so does ~230,000 subscribers. I can watch it while I eat breakfast in the morning