this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
743 points (97.6% liked)

Selfhosted

52704 readers
394 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the best pieces of self-hosted software ever to exist.

Edit: This is Immich! for the folks who don't know.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShadowZone@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hmm. While I applaud Immich for existing at all, it kind of feels developed with not me as a user in mind. I have Terabytes of pictures I have taken over the couple of decades of my adult life. They are all neatly organized in folders on my NAS. There is no easy way to just tell Immich "oy, that folder structure? Turn it into albums" I am never going to manually put my 400k+ images into albums. And the folder view in the Android app is behind too many clicks to make it any fun using it.

I guess I have to wrangle with the CLI or something to turn my folders into albums.

But... why??? People use existing file structures. Make it easy for those to integrate into your app.

Nothing of the sort on the roadmap either. Unless integrating folder structures into Immich albums gets more user friendly, I am reluctant to support the devs.

I'll probably do it anyway because as I said, I'm glad the project exists.

Thanks.

[–] aspoleczny@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ShadowZone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Sounds exactly like what I need. I'll give it a try. Thanks a lot!

[–] luftruessel@feddit.org 1 points 23 hours ago

Currently working with immich go for migrating my images from a folder based structure. It works like a breeze.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, ideally something like Immich is just some metadata pointing at existing files. An album should be some combination of synced directories (i.e. new files added outside Immich should be detected and added, if selected) and individual files.

That doesn't sound that complex. Maybe I'll look into Immich and see about adding that. I don't currently use it, but I don't have an image solution, so I'll give it a shot.

[–] Eknz@lemmy.eknz.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you see the external libraries options?

I haven't used Immich, so no. I might get around to it sometime in the next couple months.