this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
146 points (100.0% liked)

World News

50735 readers
1666 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Lol, Vladdy already tried a nuclear test. Was it last year? This year? I forget... Either way, it failed.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Are you sure you’re not thinking of a test of a nuclear-powered thruster for a non-nuclear weapon?

That’s an important distinction.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You mean a dirty nuclear bomb/rocket that can easily swap out a conventional warhead for a nuclear one.

That is not an important distinction. It was a nuclear test.

[–] remon@ani.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Testing a nuclear reactor (which happens all the time, all over the place) is very different from testing a nuclear bomb.

The distinction literally couldn't be more fucking important.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

OP said nuclear test, not a nuclear bomb. It was definitely a nuclear test.

Furthermore, this is why Trump is asking for nuclear testing as a reaction to Russia's big bad new weapon. Also, the whole spend more money on the military angle that the US is obsessed with.

So there is no distinction because you are just wrong at this point on multiple levels.

[–] remon@ani.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

And the comment after that clarified that this article is about nuclear bomb test, not a nuclear powered vehicle, to which you then replied with the absolutely ludicrous statement that the distinction isn't important.

Feel free to keep arguing, but you're just putting on your clown make up right now.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Apparently, you need to comment on another thread where you are not blatantly wrong.

Also, you are acting pretty trollish for getting put in your place.

[–] remon@ani.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -4 points 4 days ago

So then you admit you are a troll.

Yawn

Another rude person who can't handle being wrong.

Thanks for posting a picture of yourself.