this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
451 points (99.1% liked)

Selfhosted

52803 readers
883 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prices are rising across Netflix, Spotify, and their peers, and more people are quietly returning to the oldest playbook of the internet: piracy. Is the golden age of streaming over?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Nah, federation is a valid alternative to self hosting

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

You're going to "own" digital content through...federation? How does that work?

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

In what way? You don't own anything on the fediverse. The people who run the various instances do.

Maybe they even have a TOS that says you own it, but then what? its still up to them to continue to host it, and they have no contract with you.

Unless you are self hosting your own instance, and only count what is on that, you own no more than with larger social media sites.

To be clear, I think that federations certainly are better than monolithic sources for a variety of reasons for real people, but they aren't a solution for ownership.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

disagree. legally a government can forcefully take down a community but it's far more difficult to police a physical ring of pirates.

pirating in the late 90s early 2000s was mostly done through physical interaction. you could download content from places like Napster, limewire, etc, but the volume of which content spread the fastest was at LAN parties.

I filled up a brand new 250gb drive after one LAN party in 2002. I still have all that content 23 years later.

point is, if we could harness the power of a "trust" content sharing would run rampant.

[–] DirtPuddleMisfortune@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So we should do LAN parties again then!

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

completely agree.