this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
740 points (97.2% liked)

World News

50787 readers
1573 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago (4 children)

To anyone thinking the that a revolution will end with "their" side winning:

its a revolution, everyone loses something

Unless it's a civil war, them everyone will lose nearly everything

And even if "your" side "wins", I guarantee you that someone will end up in charge that is a hundred times worse than what you started with. The Russian Revolution was to get rid of the tsars and make everything fair for everyone and instead they ended up with Stalin oppressing the shot out of everyone, as a semi random example

If and when this goes south for the US, everyone will regret it. There is nothing as bad as a war that puts neighbor against neighbors, and sons against their fathers.

[–] lunaluster@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is a garbage liberal take. The Russian Revolution yielded tremendous victories for oppressed people in Russia. It is dishonest, ahistorical nonsense at best to omit the horror that was the Tsarist empire in contrast. That you can point out contradictions within that society in the 20th century explains nothing about what happened to it.

I guess people should just do nothing?

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

The people should leave while they can.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Not to mention the Civil War in USA.

These libs will literally endorse slavery if it maintains their own personal privilege.

That's basically the whole history of USA.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

People really lionize the French Revolution. I get that the grievances behind it were very real but it also led to years of mass slaughter and ended up a dictatorship and then monarchy again anyway.

It worked in the US due to the distance from the main political power center and the existence of local governing institutions that had already been around for a while. A revolution in your home turf, that shared with the political power base, is a different ballgame.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Russian Revolution was to get rid of the tsars and make everything fair for everyone and instead they ended up with Stalin oppressing the shot out of everyone

I believe that if you allow people to get power who have killed lots of people to get there (i.e. killing all the nobility), then you've essentially made murderers your new rulers. That's a big part of why Russia ended up with Stalinist terror.

Transfer of power needs to be peaceful. There must be no bloodshed during the next revolution.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

I very much agree with you

There are reasons why you sometimes during a revolution or at the end of a war need to end the lives of a few people, certain ring leaders. See the Neurenberg trials for example.

But yeah, the Soviet Union went way way over the edge and started killing people indiscriminately just because terror. Something similar happened (and in some way still happens) in china. It's the main reason why I'm veryuch against communism

Tangent that is required because I hear the tankies furiously tying: Give me socialism supported by a very well clamped down capitalist system that simply puts hard limits in how much anyone can own. Anything over (for example) 10 million in net worth goes 100% to tax. Companies cannot be worth more than 1 billion, the rest goes 100% to tax. Gives the government a huge tax income to pay for a socialist system that can pay for free healthcare, free education, free housing, hell, universal basic income even. Companies cannot get too powerful, people cannot get too powerful but at the same time it leaves the rest as-is, so we retain all our freedoms

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Lincoln was a jackass, huh? \s

Peak lib privilege.

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

He wasn't really a revolutionary.