this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
834 points (98.0% liked)
Not The Onion
18606 readers
1256 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To be fair: "A magnet works because negatively charged electrons repel each other. "
"Why do negatively charged electrons repel each other? "
"..... Well .. Ok, so hear me out. You're going to need to understand quantum mechanics and then the fermion principal. Then you'll know that the electrons aren't allowed to occupy the same space, and the easiest way to avoid being in the same space is to not touch each other. The electrons know they aren't allowed to touch because they've studied fermions."
None of that is correct though.
Permanent magnets attract/repel because of aligned current loops in the material. It's an electrodynamic effect that's not related to Pauli Exclusion.
Yes it is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermion
I've used magnets to cook rice, build motors, and a variety of misc dumb shit between but I have no idea of if any of this or the other post is even real
Just as God intended.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO0r930Sn_8
That dude shared the Nobel prize for Quantum Electrodynamics, and is a legend of teaching physics. That few minutes might not teach you all about magnets, but it might convince you that understanding them is a a big big question.
Another interesting thing about Feyman's video is that since the time he made this, the reason of why ice is slippery has actually changed, and his long-standing theory is no longer observed as correct. It's a different reason, involving dipoles.
There’s a wonderful video fragment where a journalist asks Richard Feynman, the Great Explainer, why magnets attract or repel each other. It goes on a tangent about how a minimum baseline of knowledge is required for any answer to the question “why”, to basically end with “it’s electromagnetism”.
It's been posted as a link in this comment thread, actually. He kinda just skates around the question. Lol
On the other hand… ”why do things fall down?” Now THERE’S a rabbit hole.
I don't think there's anything necessarily wrong in simplifying a subject and allowing that simplified answer to be the one the public knows
I think it's acceptable to simply say that magnets of the same polarity repel each other, and not going to the explanation as to why. It's up to people if they want to understand that, and they can seek that information out themselves.
Also I think it's perfectly acceptable to explain gravity as a force that pulls things down. Trying to go into the whole area of space time and light cones is unnecessary for the casual explanation.
I would not think any less of a political leader if their understanding of magnets was simply the basic one that everybody else knows. But I absolutely would think less of my leader if he appeared not to even have a high school level understanding of magnetism. It would make me worry about what other things everybody else knows, that apparently he does not.
Yep. And for the most part the answer you'll get is just that "these are universal forces. Excepted as observably true, but the why is seemingly unknown beyond "it's a universal force."
We can mostly know what magnets are doing, but answering why it's a universal force that just is, is a different matter. We just know electrons really don't wanna touch each other, and I'm assuming if they did, matter wouldn't exist.
"down" is "just" a name for the direction everything falls.
Why do things fall? What happened to "a body at rest stays at rest"?
If no net forces are applied to that body. That's what.
I think you may have taken me too seriously, but if so that's a very dismissive response. I think your reply would be improved by describing at least one (nigh-universal, so it applies to "things" in general) force and saying why it exists.
So they can learn to pick themselves up?
"The stuff that stuff is made of has sticky lines around it, that's sort of how they stick together. We can line up the stuff that stuff is made of in a way that makes those lines stretch out and stick to things further away. Everything is magnets."