this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
535 points (98.5% liked)

Europe

8334 readers
1750 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 66 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Many cities in Switzerland are implementing the same, but there is significant opposition from the rural areas. I hope we will arrive at 30km/h in all urban areas.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"We would like to set a speed limit in the cities."
"Yo boss, the people from the countryside are protesting about your law in the cities."

What

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

How does no one in this thread realise that these "urban areas" speed limits also apply to all the tiny villages that are currently 50kph. In Europe any time you pass a village entry sign you are now in an urban area as far as speed limit goes. PS: I am for the 30kph limits, no qualm there.

[–] Localhorst86@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, that's how I read it, too. It's going to be the default for any urban area, cities of millions, towns of dozens.
But that doesn't stop rural towns from increasing the speed limit by posting a 50kph sign, either where it is reasonable, or overall. When you enter any town/city-limits by car, you need to slow down to 30kph, unless there is a speed sign allowing for higher or lower speeds.
This is literally all a town needs to say "the 30kph limit is nice, but we don't want that":

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's because many people, especially in the "car bad" crowd, don't give a fuck about the rules of the road as long as they don't see any personal benefit for themselves in others obeying them.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Weird take.

I'm in the "car bad" crowd (actually, it's the "car useful, but should be mostly for emergency services, disabled people, deliveries, etc. including in rural areas for people who need it)

I care very much about the rules, and how it affects everyone. Rules make driving safer. Having 30km/hr default doesn't prevent a town from putting up signs on certain roads to increase the limit...

This law is also good for town life, because side streets become more pleasant and safer by default.

Like, it's not making the limit 30 km/hr on a rural highway...

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I do realize that though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We mostly commute by train cause we have amazing public transportation, unfortunately they are working on cutting the 50% discount card for frequent train travelers because (no joke) too many people are using it (about 1/3 of the country). This will lead to public transport being more expensive than owning and commuting by car for many.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Sure, and for 90% of they distance they would still be unaffected. So there is still really no reason.

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago
[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Hot take: Rural drivers shouldn't get a say in how urban roads are designed

It's not their city. They don't live in it. They can stay in their town if they don't like it

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

My thoughts exactly!

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

They can stay in their town if they don’t like it

Literally no. By definition small towns don't have a lot of things in them, and so the things they do have tend to be pretty basic. If you need specialist medicine, for example, you definitely will have to go to a major city. And that's not even getting into the open countryside people, who exist in at least the less dense European countries.

I mean, you can still hold the position they shouldn't get a say, but not that they can totally opt out of whatever is decided.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it not crazy to think that people in rural areas also enjoy the city and go to urban areas? It's still the same country.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As visitors though. I don't think their needs are irrelevant, but they shouldn't carry as much weight as the daily users'

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the inhabitants of small towns driving daily to work to the next city get a say? I don't know about Switzerland, but in my area these are a considerate amount, if not the majority of cars in smaller cities. Most don't need a car living in the city, but you cannot commute into the city without in most cases.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Would you consider someone who uses the road daily as a daily user?

If so, re-reading my comment will provide a solution.

Not sure it's visiting necessarily if it's their nearest urban center, as then it would be their main source of a lot of stuff so it's theirs too.

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (12 children)

That sounds fair but urban people don't seem to have any issue with forcing their opinions on speed limits on rural people. If it works one way then why not the other?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] chocrates@piefed.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

More incentive fo bikes and public transit if taking a car is more obnoxious (and safer for pedestrians)

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago

Exactly. We have excellent public transport (possibly the best in the world, tied with Japan) and distances are short because the country is so small.

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bus is also gonna go 30 max though?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Buses generally don't go fast anyway in urban areas

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They do, it's just the average speed is low because they have to stop every few hundred meters.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

I once had a grad class that let out at at 10pm. On the bus ride to class, I was fine. On the ride from class my stomach was in my throat, all the nausea. After a few classes I figured out the difference: on the way to class, there was traffic and people getting on and off. On the home the bus just booked it over all the potholes because it didn't have up constantly stop.

That's also when I learned Dramamine [anti-nausea med] makes me wicked nauseous on an empty stomach.

Probably one of those cultural things that differs by locale

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why? The rural areas are by definition not urban.

[–] Manfredolin@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are.

For any built up area with appropriate signage, the urban speed limit gets applied.

Also a large chunk of the rural population is commuting by car, and has to change their (driving) habits, and changing habits takes effort.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right, do if an area isn't rural, it's not considered rural.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It's different in Europe. When they say "rural", they mean any small town not adjacent to a city or other conurbation.

The density of small towns that have hundreds of years of history but are only 5-10km apart from the next 3-4 towns surrounding it are in a stark contrast to the 20-50km distances between North American towns. And rural farms are relatively rare. Farmers generally still live in the small town and then drive their tractor out to the fields.

load more comments (7 replies)