this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
1116 points (98.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

8182 readers
1114 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yakko@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He thinks he's going to get a repeal of Loving v. Virginia? Who does he think the vice president is married to?

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The president married an immigrant too, lol.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Usha Vance isn't an immigrant to be fair

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago

she's not white, so she's an immigant. At least according to MAGAts.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 3 points 3 days ago

Oh no, I meant Melina. Though Usha needs to find a better guy. Good lord, haha.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Option A: "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Option B: that's how Vance plans to get out of it and go after Charlie Kirk's wife next

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago

You're on the money, maybe in both cases.

Pointing out the ridiculousness and hypocrisy of these men does not challenge them anyway. They are comfortable with their madness, I know this. The jokes are only for us at this point.