this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
360 points (97.4% liked)

World News

51034 readers
2433 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The worst-case scenario is now a possible one: European troops fighting off an invasion largely alone.

It’s by no means clear the Europeans would succeed. Romanian and other European officials at the exercise in Cincu, about 260 kilometers (162 miles) north of Bucharest by road, voiced concerns about how long it would take for NATO allies to make it to the front.

French four-star General Philippe de Montenon said he’s confident Europe could prevail, even without the US on side. “The direction of history is a progressive disengagement of the United States from the European continent,” he said.

archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is such a bizarre outlook on reality. You watch Russian TV a lot?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Again, very bizzare take. There are people in literally every country that wants foreign influence or bases out, that proves nothing and that number of people is very minimal compared to people who want them. The locals in Okinawa are one such example as the military presence is disturbing and soldiers are not known for ethics. I'm in one of your so claimed "occupied states", and everyone's thankful for the alliance (literally no one calls it occupation except Russian people living here who hate everyone who tries to defend themselves from the next invasion).

Random, but did you know an alternate name for Russians where I live is "occupiers"? If you say "occupiers", literally everyone knows that means Russians.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There are people in literally every country that wants foreign influence or bases out, that proves nothing

You don't think an enormous population of foreign military resulting in high rates of unprosecuted sexual violence and organized crime demonstrates anything about the state of politics in the host country?

So you believe people in Korea, Japan, and the Philippines at the highest levels of power just... want this for their people? Or do you think they're so beaten down they don't believe in their own capacity for self-defense?

Random, but did you know an alternate name for Russians where I live is “occupiers”?

I mean, you keep coming back to Russians, as though you think they're a different species.

I guess you'd call them, what? Orks?

Is the violent occupation of conquered territory only a problem for you when the occupying army is Slavic?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You don't think an enormous population of foreign military resulting in high rates of unprosecuted sexual violence and organized crime demonstrates anything about the state of politics in the host country?

So you believe people in Korea, Japan, and the Philippines at the highest levels of power just... want this for their people? Or do you think they're so beaten down they don't believe in their own capacity for self-defense?

Please read the article you yourself sent me and give me source for your "high rates". I'm not denying the issue exists, but officials have been fighting this issue with good results. If you think few bad apples are worse than risking entire country and millions of people then.. I can't even argue that, I'd just call you extremely dumb and move on.

Is the violent occupation of conquered territory only a problem for you when the occupying army is Slavic?

The irony here is that I'm Slavic. I also clearly signalized against Chinese aggression. I'm not anti-Russian, I'm anti-whoever-can't-stay-in-their-borders-and/or-do-colonialism

EDIT: Random, but who do you think is responsible for more Slav deaths - Nazi Germany or Russia?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please read the article you yourself

Buddy, you can try reading past the first paragraph. There's an extended back and forth in the interview discussing the violence around these bases and their broad unpopularity.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can just say "alright, the statistics really do look better, the issue is being fixed, officials are talking about it and I was wrong for saying that country should be defenceless because of few bad apples"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 3 hours ago

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-0132-1_1

Do you have a source for your claims? Because I do for mine. Also, look up land used by US in Japan. It has reduced by nearly 50% since they entered Japan.