this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
656 points (99.2% liked)

Selfhosted

46653 readers
655 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lefixxx@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah I remember once when my friends Synology started acting harmful when he run jellyfin on it. it started off gasing mustard gas. It poisoned the well and made his son addicted to zyns. All of the cars in his neighborhood needed new batteries. The country's GTP dropped a lot that month and the ozone layer is gone. Thank God YouTube stopped platforming such harmful content. Too bad so luch damage has already been done.

Yes, exactly. The server I run jellyfin on kept promising me cake, though I am fairly certain the cake is a lie.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Synology is already enshittifying itself

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

I would go so far as to say they are already in a shit state, but they're just not stopping the process yet.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's pretty harmful to Googles cloud business.

[–] grueling_spool@sh.itjust.works 17 points 16 hours ago

Who would win:

  • A 2 trillion dollar multinational technology company
  • Some guy's hobby project
[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 45 points 1 day ago
[–] jim@programming.dev 102 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think a few folks haven't read the article or know who Jeff Geerling is. The title of this article is confusing.

Jeff posted a video on YT about how to self-host your own media in 2024. He recently got a violation from YT that YT considers his video to be harmful and dangerous. He appealed, got denied, but then the update is that YT removed the violation.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Saw the video… It mentions ”ripping” and even shows clips of some blockbuster movies. No wonder any copyright-sensitive automation gets triggered pretty fast. This will only get worse.

[–] dieTasse@feddit.org 4 points 14 hours ago

I think if the ripping includes de-DRM-ing it's is illegal in a lot of countries. I am not saying it's right, we should own our own content, I am just saying it as a fact.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What if I decide to digitize my entire movie catalog? I would have to rip those DVDs and blurays...

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah. That's illegal in lots of countries.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

But it is legal in the country he lives in as well as the country YouTube is headquartered in.

[–] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Is it? I'm not totally sure, as I'm not from the US but I think the DMCA is the nasty player in this game.

[–] couldbealeotard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

A lot of people don't realise that the application of the VCR was technically copyright infringement, especially so when you lent tapes to your friends.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty fast? The video was uploaded in 2024.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 4 points 16 hours ago

”Pretty fast” after they tuned those automations to the current setting. And they will keep turning it that way unfortunately.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jeff should consider hosting on Peertube and keeping his Patreon active. He's awesome and more than capable, I'd mirror him in a hot second.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's on float plane. I think he's trying to make a living, so I'd assume YouTube ad revenue is a factor

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's on float plane

I'll never support anyone on that platform. I'll never do anything to give LTT a cent.

[–] dieTasse@feddit.org 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dieTasse@feddit.org 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Can you tell me more please? Or send a link please? I would like to know what happened, thanks.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 42 minutes ago

It's been talked about to death. It's been analysed to death.

But here's a very detailed and thorough breakdown:

https://youtu.be/0Udn7WNOrvQ

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm not big on LTT either, I'd like to see him on Nebula. The price is reasonable and they have some really good high quality content.

[–] grozzle@lemmy.zip 6 points 15 hours ago

I seem to remember Jeff explaining his choice, and a big factor was that Nebula doesn't have comments under videos, nor any other similar forums for video posters and watchers to chat. I think he said he wouldn't be happy without that direct interaction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It says (updated) but what is the update?

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 153 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Update (one day later):

YouTube has just reinstated the video, after what I presume is a human review process. I wish it didn't take making noise on socials to get past the 'AI deny' process :(

Go forth, and self-host all the things! I'll post further updates in this issue in my YouTube project.

[–] BlessedDog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

All European citizens have the right to object to automated decision making under the GDPR

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 30 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Go forth, and self-host all the things!

He means self-hosting as in hosting his own PeerTube instance? Right??? 🙏

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago (17 children)

YouTube restored the video, but not until Jeff had made a huge stink about it (and rightfully so, those yt fuckers can eat a dick).

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Isn't that what an mp3 players main purpose is? Are mp3 players bad now?

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes cause they can’t sell you a subscription for your mp3 player.

Fucking rent seeking behaviour from corporate parasites.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Correct, if you ain't streaming from corpo, you are denying them engagement and profits

That's a crime, shit Lord

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] suswrkr@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it would be amazing if geerlingguy was the one to make youtube go mask off

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Google has been mask off since they removed "don't be evil" as their slogan, and they've been proving it ever since. Apparently people don't pay attention!

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hey kid.... You wanna self host an api call? 😈

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›