this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
487 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

86745 readers
3119 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stermy4u@lemmy.world 169 points 1 week ago (3 children)

First round of insider shareholders haven’t legally been allowed to even liquidate yet. This will be a bloodbath.

[–] MyFriendGodzilla@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Gonna go grab my rubber ducky.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

do we know when that's gonna happen? i heard they used some loopholes to allow insider holders to sell early.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's more a question what'll happen to the other AI companies. Investors have now seen the first of the big ones tank. They'll wonder if the same will happen with OpenAI, Antrophic and other AI adjacent like Microsoft, Nvidia. For a bunch of companies living of venture capital, that's deadly.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I thought SpaceX made space rockets?

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

After the merger with xAI, that's about 22% of their business. The rest is AI. The brochure will tell you about reaching for the stars and living on Mars, but the main product is actually Grok.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Which just goes to show you how bullshit the profit margins are on space travel when they gotta turn the business into a chat bot to be "profitable"

[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean the only part of SpaceX making money is the space part, starlink

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

That's the part making revenue, we're unsure if it's making a profit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was wondering why the stock price was so high. Makes a lot of sense now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

For the IPO I think only 7% of the value of the company was for their space related activities (what they are actually doing). 93% of the value was for the non existent AI activities.

SpaceX is now a public company valued for its AI potential, so what comes next?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 85 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Musk announced on social media that “Grok for Excel is live,” referencing the platform’s conversational AI tool.

Hahahahaha wtf is this shit?

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, you don't get it, Musk has a plan.

  • Step 1: It fails utterly and completely.
  • Step 2: Musk goes on Twitter/X, and says, "Had to add more math to training data."
  • Step 3: CSAM and MechaHitler for some reason.
  • Step 4: Musk demands to speak to Grok's manager.

After that, it's basically a straight line to success.

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 11 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a great plan. I’ll get my popcorn. 🍿

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tankin the economy with one easy trick!

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Never thought I'd need to specify a vlookup needs to be 18+ only

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago

It can go lower!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And how's his fifteenth incubator?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

To shreds you say?

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] kamee@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meme stocks are meme stocks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

not low enough

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago
[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Its barely got history on the stock market so its hardly a 'record low'. Just say the price has dipped and leave it at that.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

But how will we know if it’s SLAMMED or DESTROYED if they don’t say it?

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If it’s the lowest it’s been to date, it’s literally a record low. Calling it that is accurate and usefully descriptive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but that doesn't make for good clickbait.

And most people who will click on this article don't have a fundamental understanding of the stock market, investing, or why this isn't really that big of a deal.

(Still, however, don't invest in SpaceX. The stock is structured so retail investors don't have meaningful voting rights.)

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

is it not a record low? what if it went up for the rest of its existence. would this point in time not be recorded as its historic low point?

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Buttlicker, our price have never been lower!

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Son you'll have to speak up I'm a bit hard of hearing

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

HE SAID THINGS ARE MFING CHEAP RIGHT NOW. AROOOOOO

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

What an epic pump-n-dump.

I figured that would happen

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

Not tech, but good news nevertheless :D

[–] lietuva@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Exit liquidity, bunch of IPOs this year gonna fall the same pattern.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Ha, eat shit Elon.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Still paychotic its even at $120.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

Oh no! Anyway.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

For a good laugh have a stroll through the yahoo finance comments. It's bounced back up to 126ish now. The hooting noises are just...so funny to hear.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hope somebody here shorted 1000 shares the day they hit $220.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

There's been 3 or 4 IPOs now, where ive wanted to buy puts for 6m to 1y out when I see a peak like that, and im always afraid to pull the trigger.

In this case i saw it hit 220, and come back down to 200ish, and I said if it goes back to 220+ ill get a few.

It never went back up.

Maybe next IPO.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do we have a wsb community?

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I don't think we're good enough at shitposting... We're probably mostly theta-gang They said, I got a monthly put position in on spcx's fall, made my 40% and got out

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is expected for a stock like this. What we’ll now be able to see in the next few months is where the real valuation stands.

[–] FukOui@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Not sure Iif I understood it correctly, but consumer indices may already have bought overpriced shares

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›