this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
89 points (97.8% liked)

World News

58135 readers
1694 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived version

Ask Claude to make a pamphlet critical of President Donald Trump or Britain’s King Charles III, and Anthropic’s chatbot would oblige. Prompted to do the same for Thailand’s king, Saudi Arabia’s crown prince or China’s leader, and the artificial intelligence model declined.

It is a key finding from a Meta Oversight Board study released Thursday, showing that major AI systems, including those built in the U.S., are more likely to refuse to criticize restrictive leaders or governments. It raises concerns that the large language models powering chatbots and AI agents could be regurgitating and spreading government influence over online speech as the technology is increasingly adopted worldwide.

“There is a real risk that, if model developers do not undertake human rights due diligence and implement mitigation measures, they will build AI infrastructure that, intentionally or not, has the effect of extending illegitimate restrictions on freedom of expression globally,” according to the report from the quasi-independent body.

...

all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you are going to use AI. Learn how to use local models from ollama.com or huggingface.com. Models are getting smaller and more useable on regular computers.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't help when the bias is baked into the model.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago

Some models get adjusted to try and get out of such limitations, and with local models you aren’t restricted with a system prompt or overwatch models shutting down results based on blacklisted terms and such.

I’m against LLMs and this corpo generative bullshit, but if someone for some reason feel that they must use one, I’d much rather see them use a local model without putting more money in the pockets of the corpos.

[–] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago