this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
753 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

86613 readers
3041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

i think browsing webpages should be the same.
load it once, then store it locally andor host a torrent for it

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Buying is renting, pirating is owning

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

It's fucked up that this is basically true now

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Better line than the "owning, stealing" one. Pirating has never been stealing, anyway, but copyright infringement.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 15 points 1 day ago

It's high time laws protected us from this. Yes, even from High Lord Gaben.

If we buy it, we own it. We can transfer them to other account. Any stores selling stuff must have a plan in place for what happens when the store closes, whether that's transferring ownership to another store, or something involving making files publicly downloadable...

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 56 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, aren't you quaint. Next thing you'll be asking for is seed corn that you can replant year after year from the corn it grows, heated seats in your cars without a subscription payment, replaceable batteries in your battery powered electronics.

[–] SavarosaCraft@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Don't forget a subscription free garage opener/motor camera.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 days ago

The starving (and recent gutting) of the public domain demonstrates the institution of intellectual property persists in bad faith. Therefore media piracy is a legitimate means to acquire and consume media.

As the C-suite and its political and paramilitary minions have shown us crime is not about behavior and consequences, but who you are and to whom you bend the knee.

[–] OleFoFa@lemmy.world 109 points 2 days ago (10 children)

If buying isn't owning, then pirating cannot be stealing. These corporations are literally herding people back onto the seas. I need to go get myself a new flag with a skull and bones, since I tied my boat to the pier about fifteen-twenty years ago.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Pirating is not and never has been stealing. You do not deprive anyone of anything when you make a copy of something.

Copyright is a dumb as shit system of artificial scarcity and always has been.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] username_1@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 2 days ago (3 children)

"Pirating" isn't stealing regardless of anything. It is unsanctioned copying.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

And not removing the product from anyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Beyond the obvious problem of paying but not owning, it's impossible to watch/listen without that data being stored on a massive corporation's server and likely sold to hundreds of advertisers. Last I saw Spotify had over 300 venders they share data with. I've seen sites with over 1000.

So you're not only paying for something you don't own, but you're also paying to have a larger profile in the surveillance capitalism machine.

[–] butWhatIfiCan@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

yeah, this is the part that really worries me. Ads are fine IMO, psychological profiling not so much. I used to hear "if you're not paying, you're the product," but now you're the product even if you are paying.

By the way, are any of the other streaming services better than Spotify for not having your data sold to third parties?

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

RE "If you're not paying, you're the product," also doesn't always apply when it comes to not paying EG: Linux and other FOSS products.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not that I know of, unless self-hosting. I've gone back to ripping CDs and sometimes buying DRM-free HQ audio. Probably getting my purchases profiled, but at least I can download it and no one else has to know when, what, & how much I'm listening to.

For easier access I have a Jellyfin server on my home network. I plan to switch to navidrome or similar for a better, dedicated music experience as well as setting up secure access over the internet for me and my friends and family.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I never built up a CD collection but I now started a digital DRM free local collection. Yes, I am actually buying that stuff (call me stupid if you like) but only loss free.

One of the few disks I own is sadly too corruoted for error free ripping, luckuly I still have it as mp3. That album simply does not wxist online anymore, anywhere. Possibly not even in the darker corners of the net. I think that happens more often than many believe.

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's always been hypocrisy. The media companies only say what part you actually own based whatever is most profitable to them.

Technically, back in the day, when you bought any music wether it be 8-track, LP, cassette, or CD, you were purchasing a single-user license for the music and the media was just how the record companies delivered it to you. That's why Napster and all the piracy that followed it was/is illegal, because you don't own a license when you copy the digital file.

HOWEVER... Over the many decades I've been alive I've scratched, twisted, demagnetized, or just plain old lost hundreds of LPs, cassettes, and CDs. Do you think if I requested a new copy of the music that the record companies would send me a replacement?

No, they would not. So I obtained digital replacements by...other means.

Now that we're all used to digital copies, suddenly that's been the important part all along.

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's why if you want to support artists, you can buy the shit locked down files so they get the artist gets paid, and then just never use them. Pay for them but get your actual files from piracy.

[–] Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

Better yet, if the artist has a website or something like Bandcamp buy from there so they actually get a decent chunk of the money you give instead of the pittance left over after the distributors and record companies have taken their cut.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago

This hasn't bothered me at all. I've been _Arr_chiving a lot lately.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

I do, raise the black flag and you can too.

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have no fear that Amazon will come to my house and remove the books I bought. If they were DRMed ebooks, on the other hand, that would be something to worry about.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I was always more angry about them editing digital publications after the fact. That's some Grade A "Ministry of Truth" BS right there. Dead Tree Media forever.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

Only way I feel I can push back is by also saving it locally 🏴‍☠️

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I saved all my DVDs because the pawn/sale price wasnt worth it... So glad I did.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TBi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Realistically we shouldn’t need laws for this. We should all just vote with our wallets. If we can’t own then you go out of business.

However there should be laws against companies changing the terms of the contract after sale.

The wealthy want you to vote with your wallet, as there is nothing they fear more than "one man, one vote."

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I do! I own CDs and vinyls. I collect mainly CDs because they are smaller and need less storage.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rf_@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (5 children)

We got frog boiled in the 2010s to accept renting out media. Me and my sandisk Sansa clip still go for walks listening to mp3s. I wonder if devices like this will see a resurgence under the idea that owning it gives you control of your media.

Like every trend does on social media, it's devolved into another consumerist "spend money" issue, but on Tiktok and other places there's a trend of "going analog" and returning to old tech. Okay not "full analog" as some people were using mp3 players and 3DS as a way of returning to tech that doesn't talk you, and those are obv digital and not analog, but that's the overall spirit of the trend.

The issue is people are going out and buying shit instead of finding what they already have and repurposing it. Use an old phone without a sim card as an mp3 player, or get one used from a friend or a slightly more ethical marketplace rather than a brand new thing you might not use.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›