this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
469 points (98.4% liked)

Memes

16542 readers
1716 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejΓ€ tΓ€nne.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Tbf I would be interested too if they just added in "he was billionaire because he has been working as tenured professor for last 700 years. I cannot emphasize it enough when I say he was NOT a plantation owner."

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

He did own a company that owned a lot of plantations, sure, but he wasn't directly overseeing any of his businesses because he was so dedicated to his true passion: teaching extremely outdated views on ethics, race, and eugenics.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 108 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Ooh, that's a deep cut. Yeah that one too, +1 for boypreggers billionaires (sick band name)

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It has no concept of the content it is talking about, and is so bland and well, disinterested.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I beg to differ. You can't so effectively undermine and bypass the intentions of the subject you're satirizing without effectively understanding it. Most of everyone in this thread is probably into monster fucker lit or dark romance on some level

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Try to ERP an AI. It's funny when you make a satirical post, less funny when the AI creates non-content, or thinks you want your heart ripped out, and eaten infront of you.

Nwm, that's pretty damn funny too.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think during that brief amount if time before everyone realized how ass generative ai was I tried using a mob boss stylized one. It didn't really know how to handle me not telling it to make sex at me. This intended dominant personality could not extricate itself from a submissive and pandering role because at it's core the whole thing is built to be a sycophantic sex toy and those behaviors will bleed through in whatever application you try to use it for. But if you got one to actually act somewhat aggressive, good for you I suppose. There is a community of dames who decided to date ai because it made them feel safer to explore that stuff

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

"It's curtains for you, capiche?" Nibbles on your ear and licks your eyeballs

Oh, I tried to provoke an AI by saying I will fight it, it just makes threats, and keeps getting ready until you get bored and thrash it.

It just takes the abuse, and continues shit talking.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Anything to that effect would have been better. I just wanted to roleplay that I was Tommy Wiseau asking for a favor to leave the mob and start my dream of a film career.

The thing just kept acting subby and asking me "so wadya want?"

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, it just keept asking a question.

It is likely because it is some 3B lobotomized model, that genuinely needs to vamp off your ideas to work.

Even a basic 7B Stheno model will do way better.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Eh, since then it's come out that these compliment machines have sooth talked people into inceldom or killing their loved ones. I think they probably don't operate within that place of safety that was originally appealing to people. Or you know, the training data comes from other humans who are demonstrably not safe so we'll probably still be talking about dark romance lit for a long time

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

sooth talked people into inceldom

I understand these words, but not in that order.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, it's been trying to talk me out of trying to raise my IQ with experimental supplements/using posiwash on literally everyone, but I literally just talk to it, ask for suggestions, then ignore all it's opinions.

It is weird, especially since I get angry if it sycopants, and it has that in it's memory.

EDIT: I'd offer to play the comforter role, but I would have even less enthusiasm than Claude, as I don't REALLY want to be around.

Guess if someone wants, I would hear them vent. I have useless opinions on that, and I try to solve problems, rather than listen.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

You're still personifying it too much. Whether or not you get angry doesn't matter to it. It has no concept of whether something matters. It's just predicting tokens based on the token correlations it encoded in its NN parameters during training plus a bit of random noise. Everything else is just trying to set up the context in the hopes that it predicts the tokens you want it to.

And since it wasn't trained on every possible context, it's overfitted to some (eg maybe a mention of yellow will make it very likely to talk about bananas) and lacks any useful context at all for others (eg your very specific problem).

[–] inari@piefed.zip 15 points 1 day ago

Stop, I can only get so wet

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 70 points 1 day ago

Perfect pairing to "breasted boobily"

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

His vampirisim restricting his self control gave an aura of a man struggling to contain his own power, and she was what pushed him over the edge and to lose control of himself. If anyone else had done what he did they'd be a creepy predator, but when he did it he was the sexiest, sweetest creature to ever lay his hands upon her.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

He mysterioused mysteriously as he rolled up his sleeves revealing his strong forearms. His proud manhood stood at attention like a soldier returning from the great war, traumatized by months of unending death and torment the veins pulsating through his member quivered like a soldier experiencing a flashback.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

Woah, look at the helmet on that one!

[–] lemmyman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Go on, im almost there 🀀

[–] Denvil@piefed.world 8 points 1 day ago

Using his wolf like fangs, unrelated to werewolves, he bites gingerly, slowly, cautiously, gently, carefully, methodically, sluggishly, and ever so gradually into your neck as he claims you for generations to come, in more ways than one

Idk what this is, but I'm staking them both.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago
[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

You had me at "Vampires billionairly"

[–] lime@feddit.nu 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

ayn rand?

...oh, actual vampires.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

I'm picturing Milton Friedman hanging upside down asleep in his cave.

Maybe Anne Rice, then

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Do we really need to be dunking on monsterfucker romantasy? Let them have this!

[–] FirmDistribution@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Do we really need to be dunking on monsterfucker romantasy?

Yes.

But seriously, Idk. They seem like light jokes.

[–] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Look I get that they're actual monsters, but I really don't think billionaires should be included in the monsterfucker kink.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago

No god is gonna set foot down here if they wanna keep it

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

What greater monster is there but the one who actually exists?

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But what if they were evil billionaires for everyone else, but financially generous with you specifically? What if you made them lose millions just with your presence, what if they couldn’t control themselves around you? You mention liking Green Day, and the next day your billionaire has hastily reinvested everything in solar energy for you. You’re the only one who can influence them, they NEED you. They’re disgusting but your love can tame them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you like mysterious vampire billionaire perchance? πŸ₯ΊπŸ‘‰πŸ‘ˆ

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

No because it's conceptually inelegant, vampire billionaire is just redundant

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago

If we make fun of monster girl foxussy hentai we can also make fun of monster boy smut vampenis

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lemmyman@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Rah rah ah ah ah

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί