this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
513 points (99.8% liked)

Privacy

50176 readers
279 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 84 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

And remove and destroy all of the installed ones...right? Right?

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

What about Motorola and Axon cameras? They all need to go, no exceptions.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This; anything else is just surveillance companies jockeying for contracts. Let's ban the thing that's bad, government's spying on their own citizens, please.

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, as much as I'd enjoy seeing bad things happen to their smarmy dipshit CEO, this is true.

I suppose a bill like this might help bring the issue to the attention of some number of people, at least.

[–] archy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Aren’t most of them funded by local governments anyway?

(And then when the city councils or residents vote to stop it, the cops leave them up anyway?)

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 4 days ago

federal bill to withhold federal money from municipalities and police departments that deploy Flock-style automated license plate reader cameras

This is so such local governments have other funding withdrawn until they get rid of the cameras, presumably

[–] hash@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

My local government had funds offered by a federal grant they didn't apply for. A neighboring county had applied for the federal grant, received a ton of money, and was dishing it out to police across the region.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Between this and local police working with ICE, it feels like a federal government takeover of everything. The sheriff of a neighboring county has his salary paid by ICE/DHS, and that isn't right. Federalized police departments.

Sounds like the police have too much money...

[–] dRLY@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 days ago (3 children)

If it does get far enough to be introduced and to actual vote. I am guessing there will be a massive push by Flock to flood news outlets and lobbyists to how "successfully bad guys were caught" or otherwise "prevented." Probably lock-in on any instance(s) involving children being protected/found. With any and all misleading stats downplaying the actual levels of spying on literally everyone not doing anything illegal (or that children are being scanned and added to those growing databases). And the fucked up cases of false positives that drag those people into court, job losses from being accused/arrested, and financial losses from the first two.

[–] A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 13 points 4 days ago

I actually saw some praise on Flock today on Facebook. Youre probably right

[–] leftOverLife@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

But what about the poor executives?!?!

/s

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Giving up freedom for security..yadda yadda

Hard counter those efforts with detailed Info on high ranking officials from flock data through FOIA. Educate themasses on what's is being watched and how all data is combined into a detailed profile

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This will never be passed because most of the people benefitting from Flock are the ones who will vote on the bill.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You think politicians like that them and their family member's every move is being tracked?

That puts them at risk

politicians like political donations.

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They believe it will only be used against the plebs.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago

So let's show them that their greatest enemies have access to this data, and that the only way to keep themselves safe is to not collect it at all

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Flock around and find out

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 12 points 4 days ago

One can hope

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 7 points 3 days ago

When the worst person you know has a good idea...

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

At the very least, it should require a warrant to access Flock data.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

That would be amazing, but I can't even consider there's a chance that it's anything more than performative. Maybe he genuinely wants that to happen, since he does seem to be one of the few US politicians actually against raping kids, but there's no way flock doesn't own a lot of the other politicians and have financial ties and data sharing contracts with bigger companies who own the rest of them.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 3 days ago

Article doesnt load