this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
509 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41590 readers
4237 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 93 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Its not about converting the crackpots, its about pushing back on insane bullshit so others are less likely to become crackpots.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 31 points 2 weeks ago

This is why dissent is important. Visibility.

[–] cb900f_bodhi@fedinsfw.app 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Agreed. Where do you draw the line between downvoting and potentially feeding the trolls? I'm having a hard time with that. When someone is acting like an ignorant contrarian, I'm inclined to ignore them.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I start off with the logic, and when they double down on bullshit and toxicity I just keep spotlighting the terrible rhetoric with no substance. In a "like damn dude, your 3rd grade teacher would be disappointed in your writing" way.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You have to out dumb them and take away their argument.

Vaccines cause autism? It’s caused by aliens to force us to build another pyramid so they can land their ship here to harvest the squirrels.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I hold myself to slightly higher standards. I'm not above insulting and throwing toxicity back, but I am honest about it to stop it from undercutting my argumentation.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like there's a certain point where you're no longer pushing back against the crackpots and just arguing with a brick wall.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

You're never going to change their minds. That's not the point. The point is to push back against them. So people who see the interaction will see the rebuttal and the pushback against the insanity. That's the important part.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not writing to the crackpot I'm responding to. I'm writing to the lurkers on the fence wondering if he has a valid point.

That might be why I'm so used to replies that look like long-form essays. It takes a lot more words to explain nuance and invite critical thought than it does to shitpost.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've had cases where I've moved the needle. Got someone to move from "I hate communism!!" to "I see where you're coming from. Capitalism has problems, I admit".

For some people, you need to let them feel heard and avoid being too antagonistic.

Some people are just trolls, though.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 2 weeks ago

I managed to convert a "god put dinosaur fossils in the ground 6000 years ago to test us," person once, although she was already questioning things so I led her to the right answer.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

You don't change the view of the person you are arguing with on the internet, you are putting a red flag so that would-be readers don't fall into the rabbit hole.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Online debate is fun. I don't care if it falls short of solving the worlds problems.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Online debate isn't fun. I care if it falls short of solving the world's problems.

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Online debate is fun

Most online disagreements can hardly be characterized as a "debate". Most of the time it's some contrarian shitlord arguing in bad faith, fishing for gotchas, moving goalposts, refusing to acknowledge reality, and/or pretending your posts mean something other than what they say.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm not a crackpot, I saw that gnome with my own two eyes they're fucking real and they're plotting against us.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If you saw anyone else hanging around a garden or forest you might say they're gardening, foraging, vibing, touching grass, or waiting until their mortal body is reclaimed by nature. But when it's a gnome they have to be plotting?

If you treat them like you would any other magical creature, spent some time to get to know them, you'd see just how wrong you were. Spend a little less time pondering your orb and little more time out in the real world.

Besides, if you examine the statistics, you'd see that skinwalkers are the real problem. Despite making up only... But I can tell you aren't ready to be red potioned on that yet.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bro I am literally a skinwalker and I can't believe you'd say something this racist to me. You know those statistics are skewed by the ministry to push their agenda.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

I've found that, while you can't convince a crackpot of anything, you can study them like a scientific specimen and it can be quite interesting

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Well, the alternative is a bunch of crackpot comments with no pushback (except downvotes) and 3-10x less actually-decent-takes

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone just wants an echo chamber and the internet is happy to oblige

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

You're so right.

[–] EffortlessGrace@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

​"Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired.

  • Jonathan Swift, A Letter to a Young Gentleman, Lately Enter'd Into Holy Orders, 1721 C.E.
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My rule to live by (and this seems to trigger people online for some reason whenever I say it): never engage with comments online. I'll post a comment, but >99% of the time there is no reason to reply. Someone has to make it abundantly clear that they are responding in good faith to warrant a response. My life has been much better since I started doing this and I would strongly recommend everyone try it out.

[–] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

I enjoy the banter back and forth until the person doubles down, then it’s over

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Almost 100% of the replies you receive are in bad faith? Friend...

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The number of threads that I’ve just completely abandoned on .ml when I realize I’m trying to reason with morons is too damn high.

[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Going to .ml looking for an enlightened discussion is like going to the zoo looking for a glory hole.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I blocked ml just this morning after such an exchange. It's noticeable immediately 😂

[–] CallMeAl@piefed.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Having a real discussion online seems exceedingly rare. Like where each person really wants to find the flaws in their own position, to either strengthen it or learn why it can't be.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's rare but it's there, and when you genuinely find someone who will take your points and offer their perspective in return it can be a glorious thing.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

It lives in the internet it lives in the internet oh god help me it lives in the internet

[–] Blurntout@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I wonder if the crackpots ever ask themselves am I the crackpot?

Asking for a friend

[–] Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

no, it never does, i mean, these people somehow delude themselves into thinking it might, but... but it might work for us.

[–] join@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the dark times of late 2023 I had long discussions with Israel apologists on here, now they don’t seem to exist anymore. Question is, if they actually changed their mind or if they just left, and if my comments had anything to do with that anyway ofc.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

They probably got called up

[–] MrSusan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

That reminds me, I really must check my inbox

[–] jlow@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Senseless@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I never commented much, apart from here and in reddit, when it still was a thing. Currently I try to avoid even looking into the comment section. It' just not worth it.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ahh yes the crackpot belief that it is wrong to support a genocide regardless of who is in power.

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago

It was never about winning.

It was always about getting shit off on strangers for self-gratification, and public shaming for reprehensible behaviours/ beliefs.

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How else are they supposed to virtue signal?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm honestly not a big fan of virtue signaling, but maybe that's just me. I just don't think dramatically stating an obviously popular opinion, like you're some sacrificial martyr, really adds much to the discussion. Crucify me in the comments, if you must!

[–] MrOtingocni@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No, I won't.

Fuck your "reason", people covet their own logical prowess but in reality they didn't come to their views on their own nor their way of seeing things on their own. In fact, it's a weakness borrowed from others, based on flawed methodology and is what got you into the situation you're in now.

I ain't teaching a class, believe me or don't, I dgaf.

99% of people are mostly interested in confirming their own myopic view, to the degree that they will commit violence to ensure it. If someone reaches out a hand, I will grab it, but that's exceedingly rare and it's not my day job to fish randos out of their own ignorance un-asked.

[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When you tell lemmy users that teachers joking about shooting their students is bad, actually.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That one was probably more about surveillance

[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, they made it very clear they wanted teachers to be able to "joke" about shooting their students.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well yeah if you aren't being surveiled you can joke or even "joke" about anything as long as someone doesn't take it seriously enough to report you