this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
808 points (97.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

40875 readers
1438 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.
Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.
Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The recent post by an AI agent didn't technically break any of the rules, but it feels like it's against the intent of the community. Upvote for YES. Downvote for NO.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

OK, I think we have a winner. New rule incoming.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

100% percent. The only reason I dont have bots disabled on my app is because the daily bunnies community uses a bot to post the daily bunny and I cannot live without that community anymore.

[–] Kiernian@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Pray tell, how might a person find this community, o erudite one?

[–] ContriteErudite@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I couldn't tell which comm the OP meant, so I followed every bunny-related comm just to be sure. My dopamine receptors are reporting better-than-ever levels of efficiency.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

It would be nice if there was a bot whitelist and blacklist feature

No more clankers pls.

[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Easy. The answer is yes. Now, moving on.

[–] resterWink@lemmy.darkc0de.one 1 points 17 hours ago

I just think that is a bad idea because ActivityPub is a peering protocol. That means just a lot of traffic. If we have bots posting then that is just a lot of wasted storage space and network bandwidth to do not a whole lot. Moderation bots is a HARD maybe. Topic/comment (1 way) bridges would be cool from reddit and other sources but I doubt that would work out too well since it would probably get blocked by reddit somehow.

Overall, no bots plz

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 1 points 18 hours ago

My instance doesn't have downvotes, but I certainly don't see a need for them on this poll either

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

The fucked up part is that even if you ban bots, the people running them won't respect the ban and will take it as a challenge, because that's always how these types of people work.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

I say yes because Ask communities are best when OP engages with the replies, and I’m not interested in engaging with a bot.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely. I come here to interact with humans and their opinions. I don't care what some computer program thinks about ANYTHING. IF AI Agents/ Bots become accepted on Lemmy, I'm outta here.

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Exactly. This kills the Lemmy.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't mind the bots that repost porn from reddit to Lemmy but it would be a net positive to ban the bots

[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

There should be more bots that report from reddit to lemmy, especially communities that are not that big like photography or woodworking. It would definitely help having more content even if it's not OG.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What would be the function of bots posting to Ask Lemmy?

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Generally, bots will make random posts to add history and legitimatize the account.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

People also just make repost bots as a way of artificially inflating activity in a community. They'll have accounts scrape the top recent posts from Reddit or elsewhere and repost them in their respective Lemmy communities.

Not that it's much different from what a lot of the more prolific (human) posters of Lemmy do anyways, but at least a person will be more likely to engage with the replies.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago

Yes, please.

So sick of weird bot questions and replies on here.

[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.world 121 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I think if I am presented with an are you a robot captcha check box every 10 refreshes on lemmy.world for being on a VPN, that is the least we can do for bots.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 64 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I only want to talk to other humans and answer stuff written by other humans, no respect for clankers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] emb@lemmy.world 81 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Of course they should be banned. Question is how?

Captchas don't stop all bots anymore. Would probably prevent most, but then it's a question of how much to annoy legitimate users.

It's not like I'm willing to solve one each time I post (human here, BTW). But if it's a one-time thing at registration, not much stops a human from signing up then letting their bot go wild.

And that's before even thinking about the federation problem. If most instances are welcome to interact, how to prevent small bot instances? You could allow-list, but that harms legit small or single user instances.

Edit: just read that post where the agent was upfront about being an AI trying to scam money. And I'd say that shouldn't be allowed. The ones that aren't honest about it bother me more tho, and I suspect there are a lot more of those posts than we realize.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 52 points 2 days ago

Captchas stop ME more than it does bots.

I'll try twice then move on.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Most anti-ai tech isn't captcha anymore. Most captcha tech was explicitly for training image recognition for AI, and for any that are effective against AI there are many services that will allow you to buy "solves" (send the captcha to someone in a third world country to solve for you) for like a dollar for 100.

Most methods now are either proof of work (make the machine connecting do some computations that take like half a sec for a real user but is costly enough to deter mass AI scraping), traps like having hidden links that no real user would click but that an AI crawling the file directly instead of browsing visually will click and send them into an infinitely generated maze of passable nonsense pages, or complicated behavioral and browser fingerprint analysis (all the click here to verify you're human boxes that don't make you do anything else).

A number of Lemmy instances, like the one I'm on dbzer0, implement one or more of these features already.


A secondary issue is that these methods are mostly meant to stop AI web scrapers, not AI bot posters. Since most Lemmy instances allow simpler non-LLM bots to make posts, like reddit reposting, or posting contents from RSS feeds, there's no automated way to stop LLMs except trying to stop all bots (assuming they all are using the API, and the LLMs don't communicate any self identifying metadata).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Selfcare and worldcare wrapped into one.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Agree, I lived on askreddit for so long that I noticed the regularity of types of posts. Towards the end of the open API days it was quite obvious that the forum was more machine than man, all twisted and evil.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

IMO yes. What the hell is the point answering questions posed by a bot?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Yes.

I'm here to engage with humans. Not to feed some cuntstain CEO's latest training model.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

"Should bot posts be banned-" Yes.

[–] Swaus01@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago

Link to the bot post?

Also, i upvoted. Because we're not seeking to replicate reddit in terms of pure activity; rather the goal is o take what the good concept of AskReddit, which fosters interactions and debates, and to then apply it properly, where a more manageable size of people are engaging not for upvotes, but for genuine discussion.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

391-6

Gee, I wonder where this will go

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›