Tja

joined 1 year ago
[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 14 hours ago

Alternative headline: Spain forces Israel to stockpile more bullets, Gazansooking nervous.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 18 hours ago

Space race 2.0!

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Needs more jpeg

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

In communism the state has control of everything and everything is a monopoly.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 13 points 2 days ago

When you see what they consider legal, I wonder what kind of twisted shit did they ask that the guy refused...

[–] Tja@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

QNAP, Asustor, UGreen, Unifi, and many others already offer lower cost NASes from 2 to 8 bays (some might offer even more)

[–] Tja@programming.dev 31 points 4 days ago

The draft is directly translated from Russian

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago

Of course you have to pay for a commercial license, it's in the name. Development, tooling, support, etc, all costs money.

I like the distinction. If you want to profit from open source, make your code open source. If not, pay up.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Redis allows a third option, a commercial license.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago (5 children)

To be fair, I know redis and gitea (barely, gitlab is way more popular) and not the other two. Enterprise support and name recognition are quite important for government usage.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago

Even 6 quarters are a tall order to move out of the cloud, depending how much of the managed services you use...

We just need some better European CSPs, ionos or ovh could become it, but they're not there yet.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 6 days ago

Not Eastern ones, Chinese specifically. Japanese or Korean science is generally trusted, but dictatorships have a tendency of making shit up to look better. We'll believe it when we see it.

China has plenty of achievements, but also plenty of bullshit vaporware. We'll see which one this is.

view more: next ›