this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
74 points (95.1% liked)

World News

51444 readers
3432 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Cyberdyne Systems approves

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

US already has AEGIS - that's figuratively skynet.

Navy even gave it control of some guns. (Phalanx CIWS, basically an M61 Vulcan minigun as a drone gun)

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Let's hope this Westworld deep cut isn't prophetic.

[–] Curiousfur@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

At least I'll have made it to 30... 15 years ago I didn't expect to make it this far

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Congratulations on finishing Chapter 2 - "Youth".

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The article gives a good overview of the situation. I have only a few things to add.

  • war is a match of game theory (finding moves that harm the opponent) and accelerated evolution of the technology and methods for doing so

  • if a weapon works, choosing not to use it typically increases chance of defeat

  • there is no doubt that autonomous weapons work

  • about the only thing which seems to prevent some weapons (e.g. of mass destruction) from being used in some wars, is threat of being targeted with the same kind, or a large coalition of opponents forming and intervening

  • so, only continued development of international law (collective agreement on behalf of a large coalition of states, representing most of human population) has any chance of restraining use of autonomous weapons

  • sadly, I don't see states wanting continued development of international law

  • restraining production of autonomous weapons is probably hopeless, a reasonably good competition robot can be weaponized with some success

So, future will have states threatening each other with swarms of autonomous weapons, and terrorist entitities using them at a smaller scale. Weapons that destroy electronics (EMP, microwave, lasers for frying cameras) will be highly sought after for defense. Air defense and antidrone systems will be much more common than today. At some point in history, there will be a war where a large swarm of autonomous weapons is used for mass destruction (maybe against civilians too). Quite possibly, a response will be given with a different weapon of mass destruction (e.g. nuclear EMP used to disable the swarm). Regulation is unlikely to succceed since states are nowhere near agreement (in fact, fighting new and avoidable wars among each other).

[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Undoubtedly, the most advanced systems in the world are being devised in laboratories in the US and China. A Pentagon programme known as Replicator 1 is due to deliver “multiple thousands” of all-domain autonomous systems by August 2025.

Why is this undoubtedly? Fact is, most other countries right now are lagging behind in this field and without extensive field testing whatever these labs will produce will be years behind state of the art. You can't design these things blind and both US and China actually lack people that have experience in drone warfare or it's years outdated so design decisions beyound basics will be worse, then those that were made with consultations and input from people that actually using the drones. There is no doubt that both US and China can pour a lot of money into it, and make great machines from engineering standpoint and they won't perform as expected. Drone warfare in current form is pretty new and ideas iterate very fast, and army procurement is anything but fast.

[–] Airowird@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

As far as I can tell, Turkey, Ukraine, Russia/Iran, ... are creating the best systems.

Sure, US & China might make more advanced ones, but mass production requires simplicity (or tons of money) and all parties supplying either side in Ukraine have learned what parts need development and can be made cheaper.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

AI taking notes...