this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
288 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

87597 readers
4064 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dektep@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

these fucking things will be the size of contact lens eventually

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

not even that unthinkable, at least for basic machine vision (4k recording are probably not going to work). Powered by induction and using low power electronics might be able to get there; although if you arent fine with implanting induction coils in your cheekbones or under your eyebrows with attached energy storage implanted it might be a bit invasive. At that point it would be preferable to develop Cybereyes - a biointerface connecting your eye nerves using a biochip paired with a camera; the space that's left in the eyesocket is probably big enough for enough energy storage for a day. Don't forget to charge overnight tho, you might go temporarily blind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't even want pervert glasses. I barely even take pictures with my phone.

What I really want is that projection from those O.G. Google glass that projected image straight in your eye. Then I could watch porn all day every day everywhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

No source, no install.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hold back the urge to punch one of my superiors at work when ever I speak to them lately because I realize they wear these.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thankfully, I don’t know anyone who would want these things

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

9 million people (7 million sold just in 2025) are spying and recording others...

And they expect even more next year... Meta is going for 20 million production for 2026... Maybe 30 million if trends keep..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I love this tech, just wish they would make independent of any corporation, just an I/O with standards to connect to your service of choice.

[–] Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I have a coworker who has them. Takes some amazing videos of fiber splicing. But just like the vr headset, I just can't bring myself to buy Meta crap.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 1 week ago

I'd like to see that too, but R&D costs for a product like this are enormous so I doubt it'd happen any time soon.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Get yourself a very powerful pocket laser, and if somebody is wearing one of these, shine it directly into their eyeballs.

There are consequences for being a glasshole.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›