this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
142 points (91.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49528 readers
393 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe I’m oversensitive? We all know our votes here are public record, but to me it seems like weird, obsessive, and unhealthy behavior.

It definitely is a red flag for me to the point where I wonder if I shouldn’t just outright block people who go around making it known it’s something the participate in.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

No, it's fucking weird for folks to do that. You're not sensitive, they are just insane and no well-adjusted person does that.

Creepy? Probably. Pathetic? Absolutely.

[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

I think if you obsess over ‘figuring out’ the person, it can be weird.

I have definitely checked post history and upvotes on some users just to get context for their comments. It has saved me wasting time trying to have a discussion with someone who only seems to ever look for fights.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For some people, that's all they have. Vote like everyone can see and give no shits about lurkers being vexed.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Same goes for commenting. Sometimes it can be funny when someone goes through your post history just to quote a comment you make 2+ years ago and still be wrong.

[–] datavoid@sh.itjust.works 74 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, the internet is filled with weirdos - next question

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

Usually, yes, it's weird. One day a while back, a lot of my recent comments were all getting one downvote, and I was curious. Apparently one person was mad at something I said and went through my comment history to downvote things. There are times where it's somewhat useful to view, but obsessing over it is strange.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago

It's creepy when they questionably ascribe motivations to how someone has voted and make accusations and threats based on it, act like a downvote is a personal attack, demand people vote a certain way to demonstrate ideological loyalty, or otherwise be really weird about it. If they're not doing that, it is probably fine imo.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 47 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah. I did it though. Wish I hadn't but shitty pattern seeking brain was like "but what if something interesting happens? What if you have an arch enemy"

No such luck, but it turns out there's a few accounts who just downvote everything indiscriminately and that's a little funny

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The doing it doesn’t bother me so much as the “Hey so I was browsing through my downvotes and noticed you downvoted me. Justify your actions to me!” PMs.

Like - I don’t even know who you are or what you’re talking about. Thanks for the research project so I can piece together all these disparate pieces of information so I can figure out wtf you’re even talking about.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

They are insane people.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 20 points 3 days ago

The doing it doesn’t bother me so much as the “Hey so I was browsing through my downvotes and noticed you downvoted me. Justify your actions to me!” PMs.

That is not healthy behavior.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago

“Hey so I was browsing through my downvotes and noticed you downvoted me. Justify your actions to me!” PMs.

Yeah that's a instant block lol

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh. Yeah that's fuggin weird. Did somebody do that to you? How fragile.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah. Not sure I’m proud of the response but I hadn’t given my self much time to think before responding…

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 days ago

I'm not judging. Weird conversation to be forced to have, hope they grow out of it

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I was curious who the single down vote on every cat post was so I checked. It was a bunch of different people. I’m still confused.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I always think the single random downvote on an uncontroversial comment or post is odd, so sometimes I check into those. A few times it's been from some account that has like 3 comments from 18 months ago and no activity since. Still scratching my head over those ones.

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

They're probably scrolling on mobile and did it accidentally.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago

No arch enemies either? Want to be mine? We can downvote and reply-guy eachother until everyone's uncomfortable

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 7 points 2 days ago

When enough people see something someone is likely to either dislike it or fat finger the down vote button accidentally. Nothing to overthink.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'll look at some users who post a ridiculous take on something. I mostly look to see if they are just a shitty troll or if it was a one off and decide if I want to block them. I don't look through there posts for context, just the raw vote numbers. If someone is majority negative on their posts, then they don't need to show up in my feed.

There are a handful of other users on here who I see frequently that I don't agree with on a lot of things, and the community agrees with me based on votes, but those users also make good comments that are beneficial to some conversations and sometimes I learn something new. I'll put up with the bad for the good.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm with you there. I don't block for disagreement, I block for assholery

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] creamfresh@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Where can I even see post votes?

[–] Beth@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago

Personally not how I’d spend my energy. If someone’s bothering me I block.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Who really cares? Everyone isn't going to have your option, if you really like it up vote it, if it pisses you off or something down vote it. Hell down vote the hell out of this post, it's fake internet points for fucks sake.

But yeah, it's weird as shit to have nothing else to do in your day/life and get so pissed at an opposing opinion that you scour through someone's history. Get a hobby or something.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 3 days ago (9 children)

It's public to stop vote manipulation and brigading. When you can see that a ton of up/downvotes on a post all come from 37 alts of the same user, it makes it easier to ban those people.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

It depends. If someone is being very vague about describing a gripe, going back through their history helps get context into what they're complaining about.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (19 children)

You should immediately block everyone who disagrees with you. Then all of your BS will be eternally enabled and you'll never be wrong about anything.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Sirius006@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

When will they stop that motherfucker?

Have you seen the guy who calls everyone stalker sockpuppets, tags all the admins and starts harassing you with his own sockpuppets whenever he gets a downvote?

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Yes, it's pretty pathetic actually.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yes, those people are creepy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 13 points 3 days ago

More sad than creepy IMO

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Without context? Yeah.

I downvote for lazy spelling, and there's no way to indicate that. I'll accept if I downvote a positive idea and in doing so make it seem like I disagree with the positive message instead of just the broken medium, but I'd rather not.

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How do you even see who down votes?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

This is up and down votes for your comment: (I gave you a downvote so you can see how it looks. Sorry)

https://lemvotes.org/comment/lemmy.world/comment/25430224

If you click the colored link icon that looks like a spiderweb, you get a direct link to your comment, copy the last numbered part in this case: 25430224 and add it to this lemvotes link: https://lemvotes.org/comment/lemmy.world/comment/

AFAIK some apps have the function built in.

[–] TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

I dunno. It's how the platform was designed. Lemmy was designed to imitate Reddit but with some changes. Looking back at a Redditor's post history was always controversial. Vote history just adds a new layer to that.

I got banned from a bunch of AI comms I've never visited; I can only guess because I'm a member of "Fuck AI". Truth is, I'm curiously cautious, or cautiously curious, I'm not sure. I'm not too big on AI, but neither am I vehemently against it (besides its affect on the gaming industry). I think the ban was just a knee-jerk reaction and probably a bit uncalled for, but again, the platform has the feature for a reason.

I always thought I had the sanest take on Reddit when it came to viewing post history. If someone was vitriolic, I'd check their history to see if this is how they are all the time or if they're having a bad day. If the former, I might downvote/block... if the latter, I might give it a few days and reply, hoping they'd be in a better mood then.

I've never looked at another user's vote history. It's not really any of my business; I don't see a real benefit for me to do so.

load more comments
view more: next ›