this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

15173 readers
64 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
08-20 SNW 4x05 "Level-Five Transporter Accident"
08-27 SNW 4x06 “Off-Hour”
09-03 SNW 4x07 “Like Chronitons Through the Hourglass”
09-10 SNW 4x08 “Orders of Magnitude”
09-17 SNW 4x09 "Once La’An a Time"

Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While IMDB users are not representative of the wider population, I find it interesting to see that they've soured on Season 4 episodes so far.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I've soured on s4 too. First one was the best, second acceptable but not really trek, and it's just been shit since.

Please just give us a final 1.5 seasons of quality fucking trek. Is that really so hard? I'm glad they're having fun making the show, but the audience isn't.

Honestly, I think "A Case of Chiaroscuro" deserves another look. If you disregard the B&W "gimmick" (which I think served the story quite well, but YMMV), I think the A- and B-stories are good, classical Trek.

A little TOS-y in some respects, but I don't consider that a knock against.

[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Agreed, the whole "every episode is a different genre" is tiresome. I think that would have been fine for just one season, with some reason for that season to be like that. The show feels inconsistent and discontinuous, which is generally not what people like to experience. A good show may have both good episodes and sucky episodes, but still stand as at least the sum of its whole, if not more than its sum. SNW is kind of the opposite, where even if you have good individual episodes (and they're not all good), the whole does not stand together.

I do appreciate the experiment in television and story telling (one of the reasons I loved Fringe way back when, even when the "science" was pretty awful), but I think they should have learned earlier. Oh well, too late now.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I find it interesting how much attention franchise fans give to crowd-sourced ratings on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes when we know that they are brigaded. Why give any credence to manipulated data?

As I have been watching more content from China recently, I have learned that the manipulation of social media and streaming audience data, especially ratings, is a very high profile public discussion outside North America.

In fact, there have been repeated attempts to develop and patent algorithms in China to detect manipulated ratings and streaming audience data and correct for them. None have successfully proved they can clean up brigading and manipulation to the satisfaction of national authorities.

Yeah, I couldn't be less interested in unreliable, easily-manipulated aggregate "scores, " regardless of whether I agree with what they say. This whole site is for people to share their own opinions in a genuine and intelligent way, and that's far more interesting to me.