this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24455 readers
177 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The country needs to find a “compromise” between privacy and safety, according to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley.

“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said during a recent interview with Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”

The Washington Post recently identified 46 cases where police officers have been accused of using Flock technology for unauthorized purposes, including to stalk their wives, girlfriends, or exes.

After listening to an interview with one of the alleged victims, Langley told CBS News, “I apologize. It kills me that she went through that.” At the same time, he insisted, “I don’t think that Flock created police abuse. I think we’re the first company to ever shine a light on it and build the tools to find it.”

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Okay. The compromise is you shut down all this creepy surveillance and hand over your company and you don't immediately go to prison for privacy violations

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the compromise is prison instead of guillotine

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The compromise is that Langley can go free, but he will be followed and tracked by his own surveillance tech 24/7, which anyone will be able to watch at any time.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

No surveillance tech, he just has to hire people at scale to make his entire life into the Truman Show.

[–] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

That works!

[–] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago

Capitalists famously call for compromise when they're not facing existential resistance from the proletarian class. Time to give up on deflocking teehee

[–] scrungus@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know it's lib shit, but Benjamin Franklin is supposed to have said, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Like idgaf about what the founders had to say, but aren't these assholes supposed to? I guess the american civic religion programming is finally good for something though, because by and large the people seem to agree as far as knocking down the surveillance apparatus goes

[–] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't understand why you'd want to compromise. What the fuck do you care? Don't you have the regime on your side? You picked your side. There's no trust left in the institutions of America and you're trying to find some? While making life worse and being unpopular?

What? Did Flock x Mamdani fall through?

[–] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

Porky is scared

[–] DasRav@hexbear.net 18 points 1 week ago

Sounds great my dude. Now face the wall.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

There has to be a more efficient way to give people free solar panels

[–] evilleftistvampire@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're fucking called FLOCK. CAMERAS. The people writing the script for the Reality TV Show we're in gave up seasons ago.

[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] evilleftistvampire@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

ahh, Thanks. Hadn't occurred to me, I guess I go to birds before sheep when I hear "flock"

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

They can track a woman crossing states for reproductive rights; cops will have a man buying marijuana and traveling back to his dry state, dead to rights. Nobody wants this, except for the fascists creeps currently in power.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

I fear what a competent fascist state would be able to get away with. If i was them, i would be touting every petty theft solved within 24 hrs thanks to Flock.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

Well well well, if it isn't the consequences of my own actions...

[–] calidris@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't forget that Axon, Genetec, and Motorola are also deploying the same thing nationwide while largely flying under the radar.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah flock is probably gonna be the sin eater or lightning rod for any social energy that culminates against surveillance. It'll get dismantled as a "concession", while the whole of the survellance apparatus trucks on unabated.

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

gui-better Your neck trade-offer gui-better Your cameras.

Dude's name for overarching survalience is fucking Langley fedposting comic book shit.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

actionable call for violence

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

"We're at an impasse here, maybe we can compromise.

"You open up the door, and we'll all come on in and [take] your [g]ains!"