this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
403 points (95.9% liked)

Not The Onion

22345 readers
1025 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (22 children)

Don't. It's shit. In the UK, every drink became low sugar as they swapped sugar for aspartame and asulfate k. Only coca-cola stayed the same and you pay the tax. I mostly drink apple or orange juice now, but I reserve the right to want to drink shitty drinks when I buy a takeaway. Companies didn't give that choice unfortunately.

Artificial sugars taste like shit and there is some evidence that despite zero calories, they can lead to higher blood sugar level.

Oh, and aspartame could be carcinogenic: https://www.who.int/news/item/14-07-2023-aspartame-hazard-and-risk-assessment-results-released

It's like when UK pushed folk to diesel to cut CO2 emissions and greenhouse gases got worse.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 135 points 2 days ago (37 children)

100% fruit juices would remain exempt

Why?? Shit’s sugar. You’re not getting most of the nutritional benefit from juice, all the fiber has been removed.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (3 children)

My guess is because it's unsweetened, and that the tax applies to drinks with added sugar or sweetener.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 2 days ago (21 children)

‘We should reduce sugar and sweetener consumption, let’s not tax this drink that’s almost pure sugar because it’s natural’ is asinine. Apple juice has virtually identical sugar content to a soda.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm more often drinking water, only coffee with stevia for up to 4 times a day, and enjoy a little soda or fruit juice once in a while as I treat those the same way as a shot of whisky. Just all in moderation.

[–] unabart@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’m gonna go broke when they introduce the Spicy Tax.

[–] python@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Ordering "ohne scharf" because you're weak ❌
Ordering "ohne scharf" because you can't afford it ✅

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The UK has had this for a while. I will be honest in that I still miss the taste of full sugar drinks, that's definitely a downgrade, however after so many years of having these other drinks available I've lately found full sugar to be just... Too much.

Some artificial sugars do a number on my gut though. Been drinking more healthier things as a result, though overall I suppose the sugar tax has had a positive effect?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Today I learned y’all dumb as fuck. What’s wrong with the comments?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›