this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
829 points (96.5% liked)

memes

22491 readers
2342 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I’m pretty sure this is the beginning of the movie Soldier (1998), starring Kurt Russel.

So... We're not getting the Terminator apocalypse? It's going to be The Matrix apocalypse after all?

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

I don't claim to be an expert on the endocrine system. But I know enough to know it's the most complicated system in the body. Possibly more complicated than the brain (my area of expertise).

And only recently did scientists figure out how to high jack the endocrine system for weight loss and not without plenty of side effects.

So in order for a baby to come to term, it must be exposed to different hormones , at different levels, at different times that come from the mother.

We can't produce all of those hormones. We can't even currently determine all of hormone needs of a fetus. So there is no way to meet these needs. Not to mention the protein needs. Again, many of which are made by the mother. And can't be synthetic.

We can grow an embryo in a container for quite a while. weeks. Maybe even a few months.

Sure, you can attach it to a roomba with temperature control.

But that's not the same as being able to grow a baby to term.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We just need something "good enough", it doesn't need to be fully developed, just to grow up enough to mop some floors, maybe pick some items in an amazon warehouse

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Brave New World vibes

[–] Muffindrake@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Chinese propaganda slop. Nothing substantial to see here. I don't even know why this is not immediately deleted by mods.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

There are two sides to your point.

If you remove it, someone just will likely see it somewhere else.

If you don't remove it, people get a chance to challenge it in the comments.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Because it's lemmy.

[–] TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

All these related AI claims like "AI will cure cancer" or anything related to AI solving otherwise unsolved scientific problems are always hilarious. Curing cancer or any other disease requires us to fully understand the biological mechanisms of the disease enough to then even attempt to affect it with a drug.

AI learns and does its thing via input data from human knowledge and our current understanding. How can AI possibly gain an understanding of the disease mechanism or biological/biochemical system beyond that which humans understand? Not to mention it can't perform any sort of experiments to even test an idea.

Sure I can appreciate it speeding up certain analyses that are otherwise tedious to do ourselves, but it's never going to spit out some magic bullet cure

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Honestly, I think that artificial wombs will be quite good for society.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

No, it wouldn't. It allows companies and states to mass produce human beings with whatever genetic variations they wish. Women are a very critical resistor to that kind of consolidation of control of our species.

Bro imagine how big we can get our skulls with no pelvic floor!

[–] sleet01@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

Lois McMaster Bujold pretty definitively argues for this in her Vorkosigan books.

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

We second this, as a trans woman, it would be really nice to actually have a child like any other woman even if it's through external means, or for women who simply don’t want/cant carry a child safely or are of parents who cant conceive/aren’t about to convince easily.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I agree. Based on my secondhand observations, pregnancy is 9 months of discomfort in one form or another, followed by plumbing problems for years afterwards. Nobody should go through that if they don't wish to.

[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Trueborns, quiaff?

[–] dregan@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you had told me 30 years ago that China would be "Brave New World" and the US would be "1984" I would have thought that you got it backwards.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

30 years, yes, but for the past 15 or so it's been clear that China is pulling way ahead in every metric. I think home ownership has been in the 90s% for a long time. Likewise, the fall of the American empire started with Reagan, it was clear where this train was headed, capitalism will always end in fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 98 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

It is just a concept right now. It has not yet delivered any live births.

"Despite optimism, experts state that the technology is still far from full implementation." https://thaitimes.com/a-robot-to-give-birth-the-chinese-announcement-that-shakes-the-world

The same proposed robot went viral in 2025 but was entirely fake: https://www.livescience.com/health/fertility-pregnancy-birth/pregnancy-robot-from-china-is-fake-but-is-the-technology-behind-it-possible

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Both those links are about the same (fake) robot by Kaiwa Technology.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm sickened by how many "flawed trials" are going to result out of such a thing before it "succeeds."

Even as a goal, this is so wrong on every level. The stuff of nightmares.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Cool, now we can make orphans with technology!

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

Can the robots crush them too or does that require different robots?

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Or, you know, not put mothers through the painful, dangerous, and potentially lethal ordeal known as pregnancy.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Why the fuck does it have to have a robot body?

What's the point? Just make an artificial womb and be done with it.

Just tacking on dog shit robotics just means it's needlessly complex and has more fault areas.

More dumbass tech shit.

[–] Sv443@sh.itjust.works 69 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're right, so there's a 99.9% chance it's AI generated for clickbait

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The answer is: gen AI slop.

However, the obsession with bi-pedal robots is creepy and weird.

I watched someone on YouTube talking about it but can't remember the channel.

Basically, there is no single task for which bipedal is the best format, it's only suitable for the range of tasks humans can perform. However, we just don't have the tech to make that format viable. As in, they can't do the dishes or clean the bathroom or take out the trash.

Demonstrations of bots doing those things are in tightly controlled environments with loads of programmed parameters.

Its appealing because everyone wants a humanoid to order around, but that's about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago

I am pretty sure the picture is not representative of the actual device.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

eh.. I see the taunts much more likely being "his dad's a techbro"

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago
[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Finally, I can clone a Duncan!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 37 points 2 days ago
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is a promising way to end surrogacy abuse in the 3rd world. I hope that future is realized.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why yes women having to carry pregnancies for nine months and then having to go through the pains of giving birth is a good thing we should not relieve them of that burden even when technology allows that thank you for asking.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

"His mom is a Kranger!"

load more comments
view more: next ›