this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
855 points (96.4% liked)

memes

23294 readers
1763 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 100 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

It is just a concept right now. It has not yet delivered any live births.

"Despite optimism, experts state that the technology is still far from full implementation." https://thaitimes.com/a-robot-to-give-birth-the-chinese-announcement-that-shakes-the-world

The same proposed robot went viral in 2025 but was entirely fake: https://www.livescience.com/health/fertility-pregnancy-birth/pregnancy-robot-from-china-is-fake-but-is-the-technology-behind-it-possible

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 57 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Both those links are about the same (fake) robot by Kaiwa Technology.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well damn, I've been seeing variations of this concept for decades, but nobody ever claimed it was "developed"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm sickened by how many "flawed trials" are going to result out of such a thing before it "succeeds."

Even as a goal, this is so wrong on every level. The stuff of nightmares.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 68 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Why the fuck does it have to have a robot body?

What's the point? Just make an artificial womb and be done with it.

Just tacking on dog shit robotics just means it's needlessly complex and has more fault areas.

More dumbass tech shit.

[–] Sv443@sh.itjust.works 70 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're right, so there's a 99.9% chance it's AI generated for clickbait

[–] Uri@infosec.pub 15 points 2 months ago
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The answer is: gen AI slop.

However, the obsession with bi-pedal robots is creepy and weird.

I watched someone on YouTube talking about it but can't remember the channel.

Basically, there is no single task for which bipedal is the best format, it's only suitable for the range of tasks humans can perform. However, we just don't have the tech to make that format viable. As in, they can't do the dishes or clean the bathroom or take out the trash.

Demonstrations of bots doing those things are in tightly controlled environments with loads of programmed parameters.

Its appealing because everyone wants a humanoid to order around, but that's about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago

I am pretty sure the picture is not representative of the actual device.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why the fuck does it have to have a robot body?

So it can sit in those reserved places on public transport. It would be wasted space otherwise.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 months ago
[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Never noticed before how nice the butt on the next human battery is...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dregan@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you had told me 30 years ago that China would be "Brave New World" and the US would be "1984" I would have thought that you got it backwards.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

30 years, yes, but for the past 15 or so it's been clear that China is pulling way ahead in every metric. I think home ownership has been in the 90s% for a long time. Likewise, the fall of the American empire started with Reagan, it was clear where this train was headed, capitalism will always end in fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

I don't claim to be an expert on the endocrine system. But I know enough to know it's the most complicated system in the body. Possibly more complicated than the brain (my area of expertise).

And only recently did scientists figure out how to high jack the endocrine system for weight loss and not without plenty of side effects.

So in order for a baby to come to term, it must be exposed to different hormones , at different levels, at different times that come from the mother.

We can't produce all of those hormones. We can't even currently determine all of hormone needs of a fetus. So there is no way to meet these needs. Not to mention the protein needs. Again, many of which are made by the mother. And can't be synthetic.

We can grow an embryo in a container for quite a while. weeks. Maybe even a few months.

Sure, you can attach it to a roomba with temperature control.

But that's not the same as being able to grow a baby to term.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We just need something "good enough", it doesn't need to be fully developed, just to grow up enough to mop some floors, maybe pick some items in an amazon warehouse

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Brave New World vibes

[–] TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

All these related AI claims like "AI will cure cancer" or anything related to AI solving otherwise unsolved scientific problems are always hilarious. Curing cancer or any other disease requires us to fully understand the biological mechanisms of the disease enough to then even attempt to affect it with a drug.

AI learns and does its thing via input data from human knowledge and our current understanding. How can AI possibly gain an understanding of the disease mechanism or biological/biochemical system beyond that which humans understand? Not to mention it can't perform any sort of experiments to even test an idea.

Sure I can appreciate it speeding up certain analyses that are otherwise tedious to do ourselves, but it's never going to spit out some magic bullet cure

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

"His mom is a Kranger!"

[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Cool, now we can make orphans with technology!

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago (18 children)

Or, you know, not put mothers through the painful, dangerous, and potentially lethal ordeal known as pregnancy.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

Can the robots crush them too or does that require different robots?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] remon@ani.social 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Oh it can give birth to live babies now! That's definitely a step up!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the dead baby machine was not as impressive.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Though to be fair, it’s much easier to make.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why yes women having to carry pregnancies for nine months and then having to go through the pains of giving birth is a good thing we should not relieve them of that burden even when technology allows that thank you for asking.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Bet the price will be absolutely prohibitive, letting only the rich use them.

Bet it will be used to shield the rich from the consequences of failing medical systems.

I'm not saying it's a bad technology, I'm saying it's being developed by the time, money, and effort, and for the benefit of parasites, assuming it's not just marketing for a cash-grab startup.

load more comments (2 replies)

So... We're not getting the Terminator apocalypse? It's going to be The Matrix apocalypse after all?

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is a promising way to end surrogacy abuse in the 3rd world. I hope that future is realized.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Honestly, I think that artificial wombs will be quite good for society.

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

We second this, as a trans woman, it would be really nice to actually have a child like any other woman even if it's through external means, or for women who simply don’t want/cant carry a child safely or are of parents who cant conceive/aren’t about to convince easily.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, it wouldn't. It allows companies and states to mass produce human beings with whatever genetic variations they wish. Women are a very critical resistor to that kind of consolidation of control of our species.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lovely how they went from having a one-child policy to having ∞-child capabilities in just a few decades.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dbx12@programming.dev 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, at least they will be bad at shooting and probably dress in all white armor.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Stormtroopers aren't clones.

[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Correct. The Clone Troopers were clones, which in the prequel movies is very clearly pointed out, but by the time of Episode IV: A New Hope the Empire had been recruiting from the general population. Much like most wars which drag on for a while, the elite forces end up having to let in new recruits to fill in gaps from those who were lost. These recruits might not have more than just some basic training, and when rebels then infiltrate weapons manufacturing plants and fiddle with the quality of the guns provided to these troops (IIRC mentioned in Andor if not elsewhere), it's no wonder the Storm Troopers had worse aim than the Clone Troopers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

All hail the dystopian future, where countries don't need people to make babies, in fact, they oughtn't, as it decreases worker productivity. They can just order a steady amount of new ~~slaves~~ workers being born.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago

This is an important step for mechaphiles with mpreg fetishes.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The same fear that people had for IVF pregnancies. No one can tell by looking how you were born (unless your head got stuck in that cone shape if you had to be yanked out by suction)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sangeteria@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

As a gay guy I'd love if this were real and widely available. I would be able to become a father, but not have to navigate the moral minefields of surrogacy and adoption

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Finally, I can clone a Duncan!

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I’m pretty sure this is the beginning of the movie Soldier (1998), starring Kurt Russel.

load more comments
view more: next ›