this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
68 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

4933 readers
294 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. military is experiencing a “beyond critical” shortage of advanced missile interceptors in Europe largely driven by President Donald Trump’s war with Iran, a U.S. defense official in Europe and a NATO official told The Associated Press, raising concerns about vulnerabilities in NATO countries to a potential Russian attack.

The U.S. defense official said the most concerning shortfall involves Patriot missile interceptors, which can shoot down Russia’s high-speed ballistic missiles. The NATO official confirmed the low inventories of Patriots among American and NATO forces in Europe. Both spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military matters.

In the event of a Russian ballistic missile assault on, for example, a military headquarters or power plant, NATO could be in a similar position to Patriot-starved Ukraine and be forced “to take punch after punch in the mouth,” the U.S. defense official said.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I feel like I give my weekly meal prep more thought than the Pentagon and Donald gave to this stupid fucking war.

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 12 points 2 days ago

I feel like I give your meal prep more thought than Drumpf thought about anything other than himself today.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago

I give my morning shit more thought than that.

[–] waltersf@bookwyr.me 5 points 2 days ago

Something something bootstraps

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That war that most of the major western countries supported

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Is there actual data to support this assertion?

Around the time Donald decided to invade there was extensive reporting about the extent to which the Pentagon tried to dissuade him from doing so and how they endeavored to convince him that attacking Iran was not a military equivalent to attacking Venezueala.

Now, if we're talking Zionists specifically, yes... they absolutely supported it at the start. I'm not sure where their support sits now that their gas and groceries have gotten significantly pricier.