this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
223 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

16638 readers
913 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 79 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Gee I wonder what types of people used to live in those neighborhoods that were eviscerated for the highways....were they by any chance a minority?

[–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 weeks ago

Curiously, cinci is seriously rethinking that specific stretch of road. There are currently plans oto kinda turn a bunch of it into a park...you'll never guess who started moving in to the west end a few years back...

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Came here to say just that. Yup.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I was trying to think of how this could have happened. Maybe large developments in the suburbs? Then this part of town just became an area you drive through, to get where you are going. Maybe some low rent apartments there where mostly people of color lived. Add crime and mismanagement. Then eventually it’s ripe for the teardown. What a waste.

[–] Denvil@piefed.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can confirm, it's a spaghetti mess here. It's not a pleasant driving experience, and it certainly isn't a pleasant living experience.

[–] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 weeks ago

That went from a place I would have liked to explore to an ugly hellscape I'd never want to be trapped in.

[–] thestrike@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago
[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

That highway could use a few more lanes.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 2 weeks ago

Why do they have their own castle?

[–] Muscle_Meteor@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Sure, yeah, fuck cars...

But was it supposed to look better in the top picture?

Like the second picture at least has a green space.

Not saying the second looks better.. But definitely not worse

[–] czl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

The green areas sem to be mostly grass, which while pretty, are bad at providing shade, carbon capture, and use a lot of water. So, better than a parking lot, but not by a lot.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago

You might not be considering the natural areas that needed to be destroyed to move all of those people and businesses. Density is better than sprawl for the environment for that reason.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

So if we go back to the 50s, where do we put the rubble from highway demolition?

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where did they out the evidently much larger amounts of housing/building demolition rubble?

[–] wraekscadu@vargar.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

What an ugly city

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org -4 points 2 weeks ago

and still houses more people, probably. because are those single-family homes in the background?