this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
191 points (97.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

16528 readers
646 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Danger of crashing is lower.

Danger of being stabbed is higher.

/s

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 24 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Who invited the terminal car brains in the comments?

[–] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 15 hours ago

Car brains sneering at unhoused people and addicts, and not stopping to think about how a society that shuns public works might lead to these scaaaary daaaangerous people existing. Typical.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 16 hours ago

Do you consider danger risk of death or risk of pickpocket?

[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

In so much as it's dangerous, it's really a question of whether your community is dangerous. A dangerous community is a problem whether you're walking, subway-ing, or even isolated away in little cars; removing access to (for instance) the subway in new York will not make people safer or reduce the 0ublic disturbances that occur there

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yes but the chance of a meth head sneezing on me is nearer zero while driving.

Another issue we need to fix

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Pretty sure this is a purposeful misunderstanding of why people think public transit is more dangerous than driving.

It had nothing to do with vehicle or crash safety.

When driving my own car, the likelihood of getting stabbed by a crackhead wanting my wallet is basically zero.

Even if the public transit events are rare, I find it hard to believe that road rage that actually goes all the way to violence (versus just aggressive driving and talk) is more common still.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty sure this is a purposeful misunderstanding of why people think public transit is more dangerous than driving.

Which means that not only did you not read the article, you didn't even read the excerpt displayed on this page.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

P sure anyone who's had their head cracked open or legs squished in a car crash would prefer the stabbing.

Pulled a guy from a wreck a couple weeks ago, I think he lived, but god damn.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When driving my own car, the likelihood of getting stabbed by a crackhead wanting my wallet is basically zero.Even if the public transit events are rare, I find it hard to believe that road rage that actually goes all the way to violence (versus just aggressive driving and talk) is more common still.

Personally I'd assume the opposite, but maybe that's my European perspective coming out