this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
79 points (71.6% liked)

Linux

14869 readers
201 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Been a long time Debian user but with the recent AI decision I am planning on moving on so anyone have an anti-AI recommendations? I understand its being used in the kernel as well but are there any distros taking a full anti-AI approach to the parts of the code they control?

Since folks seem a little confused on what I am referring to here is the mailing list page regarding the use of gen ai without disclosure vote: https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2026/08/msg00360.html

Phoronix article on it: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Debian-Votes-Responsible-AI-Use

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nocteb@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago

I you are ready to make an exception for the Linux kernel you might as well make an exception for the Debian distribution which is the basis of a lot of stuff.

[–] Sgn@programming.dev -1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Linus himself said the linux project is not anti AI and if you dont want AI in Linux, fork it.

[–] ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

just fork it bro, what a disingenuous argument for a codebase with 40+ million lines of low-level code

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why you think Debian is embracing AI

They took a nuteral stance on it

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

I wouldn't call that neutral. Allowing it with no disclosure sounds like embracing but trying to hide it.

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Given Debian's slow development and focus on stability above all else I doubt this will make any practical difference to contributions that actually end up in releases. And honestly at this point every OS or piece of software needs to have AI reviewing its codebase for vulnerabilities, even if it's not making any code contributions.

[–] buran@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For the people who really don't want AI in their OS, check this.

No AI OSes

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Ooh, that's one I hadn't seen. Thanks for sharing!

[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So . . . maybe it's a good thing that Gentoo with GNU Hurd exists? Does Hurd even have an AI policy?

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 4 points 15 hours ago

Hurd doesnt even know AI exists.

[–] simpolomeo@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Arch, Void, Gentoo, Chimera and Aeryn all have anti-AI policies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I am probably gonna ditch linux all together because the creator has been infected by genAI ( used LLM to heko debug, which is a big sin in my codebook ), so I have been trying NetBSD. I got it installed last night, but now I need to figure out how to get xfce4 to be default desktop environment I boot into.

Someone else listed a no-ai OS website, so I am gonna look into some of the other BSDs there as well.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›